AE/CE3K blog had 8,176 views last month.
I had to laugh as I realised that there was a Followers tab and after a couple decades and 955828 views and 2089 posts...I have two followers.
But then, out of the 955828 views how many led to book sales? Zero so wake up calls to reality can be fun.
Asking that question means that you have never read any of the five books that I have published on the subject. What I have clearly stated is that an account from one person with no corroboration cannot be considered as evidence. Do I read or listen to those accounts? Of course I do because they may not offer proof but there could be aspects that only someone who studies these cases recognise.
Most You Tubers put out "alien abduction" or UFO videos for one reason and one reason only; they get a lot of views. Views means money so the fact that they spin out a tale proven to have been a hoax 50 years ago does not matter. The fact that when they do tend to stick to facts and a case is very clearly sleep paralysis or an altered state incident they say that the case can be dismissed as such "but this isn't the case" with no evidence to state why it isn't.
Many cases are psychological in nature where the person involved only "realises that they are a life long UFO abductee" after reading a book on the subject. Things then spin out of control as I have shown so many times on this blog and in my books. The fact that images of a "Grey" alien in a book leads them to say "That's it! Tat's what I saw!"but when asked to draw or describe the "alien" they saw they come up with different details to the image they saw. There are, at my last counting, 20 all different images of a "true grey". Read Many Shades of Grey https://aeceiiikp.blogspot.com/2022/11/many-shades-of-greys.html
"Why would these people lie about such a thing?" Money. Notoriety. TV appearances -the list goes on. The other reason is because they believe what they are reporting and there are many examples of this (check out my first book for an explanation of "Ruth Syndrome"). They are NOT "mental" in any way and Ruth Syndrome appears to be something that affects people in all walks of life. Ufologists are just playing at looking for the truth behind UFOs and most are not equipped to fill in a report form themselves. So knowing about psychology and "other stuff" is of no interest and they will even tell percipients that they only saw what they thought they saw because it was a "screen image" planted in their memory to hide the fact that Greys were involved😒
I have cited cases involving just one percipient (again showing that those asking the afore mentioned question have never read my books).. Low credibility but then how does one explain all the symptoms of radiation poisoning in someone picking blackberries in the middle of the countryside? Some ground traces on examination could not be explained by official investigators (NOT Ufologists). At the same time as the person has their brief encounter and passes out people in the area hear strange sounds, an unknown object -also seen by people in cars some distance from the encounter site. All reported as flying saucer sightings before the actual entity encounter is known. That bumps up credibility somewhat. You take each case as reported and look at the facts as well as, if you can, communicate with the percipient.
What people are ignoring in my books (which they have not read!) is that I am presenting cases that are hard or impossible to explain away. Where there are secondary witnesses to an object flying above a car as well as physiological effects and even some trace evidence. There are some very little known cases in which details corroborate details in later cases yet the original report was unknown and not published. It is how you can find corroboration about entity appearances not noted before.
Small, dome headed entities were known before the whole "Grey" explosion but they were NOT "Greys" and they were not carrying out generational abductions and including here past life abductions and "in the womb" incidents. Why do people not take Ufology seriously? Also, anyone who claims to be a 25, 35 or 40 years "UFO veteran" and have no ideas or interest in entity cases is a total waste of space.
Present a data base of credible (as credible as it can be) evidence for encounters and just hope that people or even people in the scientific community have enough interest to read, maybe even double check sources.
It is 50 years since I started out looking at these cases and back in the 1970s Adamski and contactees were still given far more credibility that UFO percipients.
Sadly, not much has changed.
Warminster marked six decades of unexplained phenomena this weekend as UFO enthusiasts and historians gathered at the Athenaeum for the 60th anniversary conference of the Warminster Thing.
The all-day event on Sunday 24th August featured expert talks, historical accounts of the original sightings, and discussions exploring the broader mysteries connected to the series of mysterious sky sightings and unexplained phenomena reported in Warminster during the 1960s and 70s.
“The first part of the day was about the history, the personal accounts of what happened 60 years ago,” said organiser Stuart Dike. “The second part focused on the ancient mysteries connected to the Thing. We’ve achieved a fantastic balance and everyone really enjoyed it.”
The conference featured a wide range of speakers, including Stuart Dike as host, UFO researchers and authors Steve Wills and John Hanson, paranormal investigator Steve Rider, crop circle and UFO researcher ‘Busty’ Taylor, musician Brian McMullan Jr from Scottish band C.E.IV, and earth energies expert and author Maria Wheatley. Stalls selling books and merchandise added to the atmosphere, with around 120 tickets sold.
The conference follows the unveiling earlier this month of a new mural to mark the 60th anniversary. Located on a wall in the central car park, the colourful artwork features UFOs and a portrait of Arthur Shuttlewood, the Warminster Journal reporter who first documented the sightings. Local artist Paul Boswell created the mural, which was funded by the Heart of Warminster community group through crowdfunding.
The story of the Warminster Thing began on 25th December 1964, when multiple residents reported hearing a strange noise, with one witness, Marjorie Bye, describing it as a ‘sonic attack’ while walking to a church service. Over the following months, reports of unusual lights and shapes in the sky continued, attracting local and national attention. Arthur Shuttlewood, a journalist for the Warminster Journal, began reporting on the phenomenon in early 1965 and later published several books on the subject while contributing to documentaries and UFO research. Key milestones included a public meeting in August 1965 attended by over 200 residents and the famous photograph of a UFO taken by Gordon Faulkner, which was submitted to the Warminster Journal and featured in national newspapers.
Since then, Warminster has remained a focus for UFO enthusiasts, with a 50th anniversary event in 2015.
You are in an isolated area and the car will not start so you get out and feel a tingling then hear a noise behind you.
You turn and see this approach.
Now what do you do??
I have more than enough data for more books but no one is interested in buying and reading so why spend a year writing, editing and then go through mind-numbing publishing for the books to go nowhere?
People within Ufology who have seen the books (complimentary copies of course) have praised them but the problem is that people today are not interested in reading or finding the truth because the internet and scammers offer a more fantasy world that is something they can latch on to
Therefore: plenty of case material but no new books as finishing a 250, 300+ or 500+ pages book and just seeing it go nowhere is soul destroying/ It's a case of "I want to believe (fantasy not fact)"
I asked someone who looks at stats and online trade amongst other things to take a look at where I was going wrong. After a week he told me that I was doing nothing wrong and was far ahead of other people trying to sell books. "Statistical estimate from 65038 views here and 86,9045 views on the AOP blog is that you should be selling 1000-2000 copies of your books".
Well, that will keep me warm on a cold and baked beans on toast for dinner winter's day! There was almost an argument because this fella thought I was lying about sales so I let him see the data from my online store dashboard. "That can't be?" was the response.
That used to be my reaction but then I realised that people were not really interested in facts just fantasy or what the UFO conmen are pushing. Prove me wrong. Oh, I know the bloggers and You Tubers who pinch my work because they are almost word-for-word when they cite reports. It is one reason that I stopped doing in depth case summaries; I spent days working on a post and sometimes translating into English and no comments just the knowledge that the work will be ripped off. So, if you ever ask yourself "Why isn't he doing all the in depth posts any more?" you have the answer. I keep everything in my head these days.
