Total Pageviews

Tuesday 29 June 2021

Yes, Orcas and Others Are Hitting Back at Humans

As mad as that title may seem

 Let's put this non-sensationally (the crew had a cup of tea and "just waited it out"); if THIRTY orcas had attacked the yacht it would not have been left afloat. 

If you read my posts on humans killing off "sea monsters" then you will know, as outlined in Pursuing The Strange and Weird in more detail, that sea creatures identified as "sea serpents" had recognised migratory routes as well as "seasons" in which they were reported. These seemed to follow the same routes as squid and whales -which might have been prey. A sailing ship woyuld appear from below the sea to have the shape of a whale so might have been attacked by a giant squid or other animal until the mistake was realised.

https://terryhooper.blogspot.com/2017/02/humans-have-probably-killed-off-sea.html

https://terryhooper.blogspot.com/2020/09/the-fact-may-be-that-sea-monsters-of.html

We know that ships vanished even in calm waters. We also know that whales attacked whaling ships -how the story of Moby Dick came about.  We know small squid fishing boats and fishermen have been "unusually attacked" by squid or that certain squid have behaved "aggressively" towards humans.

None of these creatures are stupid and are recognised for the IQs  -often played down by pro fishing/whaling circles. In certain areas even the friendlier dolphins have been "aggressive" towards humans. The same with some seals.

Humans have slaughtered many millions of sea creatures as well as driven others to extinction but the myth of "unthinking" animals is still perpetuated. Orcas are now making it clear, as are some other species, that you kill them and their young often for no reason other than "They eat fish" then you are being warned.

NO CREW were attacked.

Read this story then the one that follows. 'Dumb animals'?

British yacht crew attacked by pod of 30 killer whales

https://www.aol.co.uk/lifestyle/british-yacht-crew-attacked-by-pod-of-30-killer-whales-193423351.html

The British crew of a luxury yacht feared for their lives after a pod of 30 killer whales attacked their boat - and even made off with the rudder.

Martin Evans, 45, and Nathan Jones, 27, were part of a three-man crew delivering the vessel from Ramsgate, Kent, to Greece.

The 25ft orcas bizarrely circled and smashed into the boat for two hours, before one munched on the rudder, and swam off with a chunk in its mouth.

The team feared for their lives during the attack near the Strait of Gibraltar, and shocking video shows the destructive animals attack.

They managed to sail the yacht to the peninsula at the southern edge of Spain, but were left stranded without a vessel when it was deemed too damaged to use.

Martin said: "I was on watch at the time and the boat was on autopilot meaning it was self steering.

"We'd had problems with autopilot during the trip - every so often it would malfunction. I turned around and saw the wheel moving frantically left to right on its full lock.

"I thought 'Oh my God, we've got a huge problem with the autopilot' initially but then it was quickly obvious that it wasn't the autopilot at all.

"I jumped round, took the helm, turned off the autopilot so I could manually steer and the wheel was just getting ripped from my hand.

British yacht crew attacked by pod of 30 killer whales
British yacht crew attacked by pod of 30 killer whales

"As I looked to my left and right - my port and starboard - there were orcas on either side of the boat, swimming along with us and bashing into the rudder.

"We were motoring with a sail up at that point, trying to make headway towards Gibraltar.

"The seas were fairly rough and we had to drop the sails and turn the engine and all of the electrics off.

"We had the Spanish coastguard contacting us because they'd heard over the radio that another boat ahead had seen us on their automatic identification system.

"An English skipper sent us a message saying 'Kismet, Kismet, there's orcas in the area'.

"We dealt with the initial orca attack for about an hour. There was nothing we could do, we just had to sit in the boat and wait for them to go away.

"We waited the attack out on the yacht with a cup of tea - the good British way to respond to killer whales attacking your boat.

"As this is going on and the rudder was going side to side, we knew it was going to cause damage because there was no way it could handle that amount of abuse.

"We could hear a clunking sound coming from the steering mechanism, giving us an idea that something had stretched, either the cables or the chains.

"We looked behind the boat and there were bits of rudder floating in the sea.

"The foam core that builds up the internal of the rudder had been torn out - whether it had snapped off from the orcas' tails or chewed off with their teeth, we couldn't tell.

"We saw one of the orcas cheekily swimming away from the boat with a chunk of rudder in its mouth.

"With the rudder damaged, we realised something was wrong with the actual steering system - this wasn't just being bumped and assaulted by killer whales but we were really in a more dire situation.

"We were concerned that if the boat started to take on water and we began to sink then would we have to deal with the orcas in the water?

"We felt safe in the boat but wouldn't have in the water, that would have been petrifying.

"Fortunately, the rudder was still attached to the boat, albeit damaged and we still had steering.

"We had about two hours of dealing with this orca attack and then as suddenly as they had arrived, they went away and we managed to get to Gibraltar."

The journey from Kent to Greece should have taken the Halcyon Yachts crew 26 days but the boat will now stay in Gibraltar, following the attack on June 17.

Incredibly, Martin managed to keep his cool during the attack and was able to film the shocking moment that the orcas destroyed the rudder of the German-owned yacht.

Martin and Nathan have since flown to Greece and have decided not to sail past Gibraltar when returning to the UK on Martin's boat, the Aqua Sue.

He believes that his vessel would not have survived the orca attack.

Martin said: "We were aware of the orca interactions that had been happening because our company had had boats attacked previously.

"I've got friends who are marine biologists around the world and they're all interested in these very unusual developments where orcas have decided that they're going to start attacking boat rudders.

"There was a stop on smaller yachts sailing along the coastline between Portugal and Spain earlier in the year due to these attacks but they'd mostly occurred further west from where we were."

Now Read this:

Gangs of aggressive killer whales are shaking down Alaska fishing boats for their fish: report

The animals have learned to target individual boats, and are leading fishers on high-speed chases to get away

Article content

The orcas will wait all day for a fisher to accumulate a catch of halibut, and then deftly rob them blind. They will relentlessly stalk individual fishing boats, sometimes forcing them back into port.

Most chilling of all, this is new: After decades of relatively peaceful coexistence with cod and halibut fishers off the coast of Alaska, the region’s orcas appear to be turning on them in greater numbers.

“We’ve been chased out of the Bering Sea,” said Paul Clampitt, Washington State-based co-owner of the F/V Augustine.

Like many boats, the Augustine has tried electronic noisemakers to ward off the animals, but the orcas simply got used to them.

“It became a dinner bell,” said Clampitt.

John McHenry, owner of the F/V Seymour, described orca pods near Alaska’s Aleutian Islands as being like a “motorcycle gang.” 

“You’d see two of them show up, and that’s the end of the trip. Pretty soon all 40 of them would be around you,” he said. 

Article content

report this week in the Alaska Dispatch News outlined instances of aggressive orcas harassing boats relentlessly — even refusing to leave after a desperate skipper cut the engine and drifted silently for 18 hours.

“It’s gotten completely out of control,” Alaska fisherman Jay Hebert told the paper.

Fishing lines are also being pillaged by sperm whales, the large square-headed whale best known as the white whale in Moby Dick.

“Since 1997, reports of depredation have increased dramatically,” noted a report by the Southeast Alaska Sperm Whale Avoidance Project.

A remarkable 2006 video by the Avoidance Project captured one of the 50,000 kg whales delicately shaking fish loose from a line. After a particularly heavy assault by sperm whales, fishers are known to pull up lines in which up to 90 per cent of the catch has disappeared or been mangled.

Some skippers will try to outrun a hovering pod, but the time and fuel needed to dodge a persistent gang of whales can wreak havoc on a trip’s profitability.

“I’ve had the same sperm whale follow me 70 miles,” Michael Offerman with the F/V Kristiana told the National Post by email.

While fishing boats all across Alaska have reported harassment by orcas, the worst incidents all seem to be occurring in the Bering Strait, the body of water separating western Alaska from Russia.

In a 2014 study of Alaska fisheries, orcas snatching fish from lines were estimated to cost boats as much as US$500 per day. Compare that to Uruguay, where a 2015 study of boats using similar fishing techniques found that “the presence of killer whales in the fishing ground seems not to affect the catch per unit effort.”

Article content

Whale predation on fishing boats is increasing in part due to a rebound of North Pacific whale populations brought about by the 1980s moratorium on commercial whaling.

Up until then, cod and halibut fishers were moving amongst whale populations that had been decimated by whaling fleets — and where survivors had learned to fear the approach of a boat engine.

“When I started fishing in the early 80s, when we saw a whale it was an event,” said Clampitt. “Now, they circle the boat.”

This is not the first time that Alaskan waters have been suddenly thrown into disorder by the changing appetites of killer whales. In the 1990s, researchers found that orca predation was responsible for a sudden collapse in Pacific sea otter populations not seen since the animals were driven to near-extinction by the fur trade.

Article content

Orcas have remarkably complex social structures, with regionally distinct languages and hunting strategies. They’re also innovative; orcas have frequently been observed inventing new hunting tactics and then teaching them to others.

In April, orcas off Monterey Bay, Calif., killed four grey whale calves over eight days in what was described as an unprecedented “killing spree” by local media. Biologists attributed the episode to a single nine-member pod of orcas that had simply become unusually skilled at hunting grey whales.

Article content

Similarly, harassed Alaska fishers say they are seeing increased numbers of juvenile whales — a possible sign that adult orcas are teaching their young to seek out fishing vessels for their meals.

McHenry describing pulling in lines cleared of fish, only to notice that some fish near the end of the line were merely gnawed.

“That was them teaching the little ones; it’s unfortunate the orcas are putting us out of business, because they’re really a phenomenal mammal,” he said. 

File
File

The only surefire way to ward off a pod of hungry orcas is pot fishing. Rather than fishing with exposed lines, boats convert to “pots”; essentially giant crab traps that trap fish rather than hook them.

It’s not a cheap fix. A pot conversion on the F/V Augustine, for instance, cost $600,000 USD ($800,000 CDN). And while the method works for now, Clampitt suspects that orcas might innovate a way around them.

Article content

“It’s possible at some point they might start hitting the pot,” he said.

Alaska fishing boats wouldn’t be the only northerners to be seeing more orcas lately. As polar ice cover melts, it has allowed pods of orcas to swim ever-deeper into the Arctic ocean, where Inuit have observed the newcomers wreaking havoc on the slow-moving local fauna.

An Inuit interviewee for a 2012 study on the phenomenon said orcas would sometimes kill “hundreds” of belugas at a time.

“When the killer whales had left the kill site, Inuit would collect the maqtaq (blubber) from the numerous dead belugas,” it noted.

Tommy Palliser
Tommy Palliser

Aside from humans, orcas are the world’s top apex marine predator. Found in all seven of the world’s oceans, pods of orcas have been seen handily killing other top marine predators, including great white sharks, walruses and leopard seals.

Unlike any other of the world’s large hunters, however, orcas have spared humans. Although captive orcas have caused human deaths, to date there is no record of a human ever being killed by an orca in the wild.

In fact, the only widely accepted account of an orca attack on a human occurred in 1972, when California surfer Hans Kretschmer suffered an orca bite to his left thigh.

National Post

Sunday 27 June 2021

Preliminary Thoughts about the Preliminary Assessment on UAPs RELEASED T...

A Few words

 I  do understand that I can be VERY annoying to people. When it comes to general "mysteries" I got into that as a kid. UFOs and the paranormal I got into in 1974. It is very hard to explain to someone WHY I believe something is a hoax or state outrightly that it is based on decades of research work.

With Grey Book and the AOP Bureau both Lord (Brinsley) Clancarty and Sir Victor Goddard stated that it would be the closest thing to Project Blue Book the UK would get -remember that Goddard was in on the flying saucer phenomena from the outset and even spoke to Presient Truman to prevent certain actions and every Director of RAF Intell after him had, at some point served under him or worked with him later and it was inconceivable that they would lie to him because he had other informal sources.
When the edited UFO Report was offered to the main UFO groups -and "researchers" - in 1984 it was rejected,. BUFORA, Contact (UK), UFOIN all said "no". Why? Because it kicked a lot of ufological fakery and misreporting up the ass and showed how ufologists had knowingly lied and deceived simply to "keep the subject going".
The solutions offered in The Report were not debunking. In fact you have to read the report to know why the evidence pointed to two phenomena being involved.
In 1982 I had to compile the bulky "Intelligence Report" which looked at the Armed Forces and Intelligence agencies around the world and their involvement with UFOs. If you read that you wou;ld know why the recent US 'disclosures' are nothing new -they go back to the 1940s.
The constant fakery, lack of investigation and accepting every light in the sky as "aliens" is why I totally withdrew from having anything to do with Ufologists and groups.
Where were all of the "Highly detailed and investigated" sightings of close proximity seemingly constructed alien craft? I decided long ago that if there WERE alien space craft of some type then there had to be aliens, right? So from the 1970s on I concentrated on CE3K/Alien Entity reports -which led on to the three books.
I applied even more scrutiny than I did in my "creature" work which clearly identified mystery creatures in France as hyena. Which showed that the Barking Beast of Bath was an escaped chimpanzee. That there were gorillas brought to the UK as early as 1801. That the Girt Dog of Ennerdale was a large dog NOT a hyena, a tiger, a thylacine or anything else the cryptozoologists want to still call it.
Do you know how I managed all of this including the findings in The Red Paper -finding 'lost' photographs and sources and more? I did what 99% of the 'experts' don't. I did research. I found those actually not lost photographs and sources and I talked to experts in different fields.
My books are all fully referenced and that means that everything I write can be double checked.
Despite all of this there ARE still mysteries that need solving and I highlight those, if you want to believe every money earning bunko person on TV who add to stories or still tell you that solved cases are unexplained mysteries still...or every You tuber who has studied all the inaccurate web sites to bring you 'facts' -that is up to you.
But if you have a free thinking mind and want to know the truth......


Thursday 17 June 2021

UFO Sighting 16th June 2021

 19.10 hours this evening I was talking to my neighbours when I saw what I first thought was an aircraft with sunlight shining off of it. It was partially clouded (dark) to the East where the object were seen but there was sunshine from the west and this was reflecting off of gulls. So my natural assumption was that this is what I was seeing about a qurter mile or less from me.

I then realised that the object was in fact two objects so small (to sight about 1-2mm) but very bright and NOT reflecting sunlight. I pointed them out to my neighbours -the oldest one saying "Thats moving fast" the other tried to get a better view t the top of their garden but trees got in the way.

I was explaining that it must be sun reflecting off birds but both objects that stopped instantly. There semed to be a slight movement before one moved off to the ESE and the other moved fast and retraced its flight and vanished over houses as it headed North.
The speed it travelled seemed to surprise the one lady who told her friend "That wasn't a bird it was moving very fast". In fact, the distance of sky it covered in 15-20 seconds usually takes the usual air traffic 1 minute plus.

The objects were white and showed off well with the darker clouds behind them (for at least two seconds they vanished through the nearer lower cloud). At first I was hoping that I was observing ball lightning but there was no storm locally and the reason I noticed them was because of the "gut feeling" I have had before other observations -suggesting a change in the EMF as I used to be very sensitive to EM fields.

Two bright lights moving very fast and steady, seperating and then going in different directions.

I am noting this for the record as I have retired and, no, they were NOT alien craft!

Wednesday 9 June 2021

Shostak and SETI Staffers Are TERRIFIED of the Possibility of Alien Visitation

 Shostak and his astronomer pals at SETI who have been churning out the same "they cant travel here!"/"Its not aliens" garbage for decades really deserve to lose their jobs.

WHY do they dismiss ALL "UFO" reports as misidentification or simply "Not aliens" when they have only seen a TV programme or newspaper item and never done what they should have; investigate?

They are afraid that aliens might be here or passing by. They are looking for signals which they pretend would be obvious to detect but in fact are NOT going to be easy to detect and even before signals are analysed and without knowing what reports might conclude they tell the media "Its not aliens".

FEAR

I wrote about SETI in my books and this inherent fear.

And look how the semi conscious media hacks treat them as the "great know alls"...even an image of ET from the movies ffs and their headline insults any reader who MIGHT consider aliens.

Daily Beast -David Axe

No, You Gullible Fools. The UFOs Aren’t Aliens.

Allstar Picture Library Ltd. / Alamy
Allstar Picture Library Ltd. / Alamy

Yes, it appears fast-flying, maneuverable somethings have been buzzing the U.S. military’s ships and planes in recent years.

Right now, it’s impossible to say for sure what these Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, as the Pentagon refers to them, actually are. But we can say with reasonable certainty what they’re not.

They’re not aliens.

There’s a long list of reasons why the UAPs aren’t extraterrestrial. Most of them hinge on a simple philosophical concept: Occam’s razor, the principle of parsimony, named for 14th-century Franciscan friar and philosopher William of Occam.

In short, the simplest explanation is always the best. And in the case of the Pentagon’s mysterious aerial stalkers, the simplest explanations don’t include E.T.

“The amount of energy it would take to travel the interstellar void is enormous,” Michael Varnum, an Arizona State University psychologist who studies possible first-contact scenarios, told The Daily Beast. “You’d do all that to visit the Navy every few weeks?”

The current UFO hype took years to build up steam. It started back in 2004, when Navy Cmdr. David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Jim Slaight were in the cockpit of their F/A-18F fighter flying a routine training mission 100 miles off the Southern California coast.

A radar operator on a nearby Navy warship radioed the aviators, directing Fravor and Slaight to investigate a mysterious object that had appeared on the ship’s screens.

Sensors showed the unidentified flying object speeding down toward the ocean from a lofty altitude of 80,000 feet, briefly hovering at 20,000 feet then descending to wavetop height. As the crew closed within visual range of the UFO, they were startled by what they saw.

It appeared to be an aircraft of some sort. Oval in shape. Around 40 feet long. It hovered over the water, churning up waves and foam. Fravor steered the F/A-18 directly at the object. Abruptly the UFO sped away, Fravor told The New York Times. “It accelerated like nothing I’ve ever seen.”

He was, he said, “pretty weirded out.” “I have no idea what I saw. It had no plumes, wings or rotors and outran our F-18s.”

Navy pilots on several other occasions in recent years had similar run-ins with UFOs. Cockpit videos of the encounters have racked up millions of views on social media. Amid a surge of interest in possible alien visitors, news broke that a trio of powerful U.S. senators for years channeled tens of millions of dollars into a military-run office that investigated UFO sightings.

The Pentagon has released more videos of UFOs—er, UAPs. And later this month the military plans to release to Congress an unclassified report on the mysterious objects. The report is inconclusive, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy.

“The report determines that a vast majority of more than 120 incidents over the past two decades did not originate from any American military or other advanced U.S. government technology,” the Times explained. “That determination would appear to eliminate the possibility that Navy pilots who reported seeing unexplained aircraft might have encountered programs the government meant to keep secret.”

“But that is about the only conclusive finding in the classified intelligence report,” the Times added. “Senior officials briefed on the intelligence conceded that the very ambiguity of the findings meant the government could not definitively rule out theories that the phenomena observed by military pilots might be alien spacecraft.”

Scientists who specialize in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, or SETI, rolled their eyes. “The leaked report is just perfect,” Seth Shostak, an astronomer with the California-based SETI Institute, told The Daily Beast. “The skeptics will keep on being skeptical, and the believers will continue to believe—and hope for disclosure. Like vanilla ice cream, this report pleases everyone!”

But count scientists as skeptics. Not because they don’t believe in extraterrestrial life. In fact, it’s noncontroversial in the SETI discipline that Earth life isn’t the only life in the universe.

Space is vast. Earth-like planets are plentiful. The chemical building blocks of organic life are all over the place. “Why should we be the only ones?” Martin Dominik, an astronomer at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, asked The Daily Beast.

But SETI experts, who have devoted their lives to finding alien life, expect first contact to come one of two ways. Either we dig up microbes in the soil of Mars or Venus or some moon, or our radio receivers finally detect signals emanating from some very far-away technological civilization.

They don’t expect aliens to announce themselves by secretly traveling galactic distances, plunging into Earth’s atmosphere then zeroing in on the U.S. Navy and flying loop-de-loops around its ships and planes before zipping away without making any effort to communicate.

“I have a hard time imagining the psyche or culture of an alien civilization that would invest so much in way of resources to see what the Navy is up to,” Arizona State University's Varnum said.

Avi Loeb, a Harvard physicist, warned against trusting too much in eyewitness accounts of UAPs by military personnel. It’s not that pilots and radar-operators are lying. But they’re not scientists. And their senses and memories can’t replace rigorous scientific study.

“It would be prudent to progress forward with our finest instruments, rather than examine past reports,” Loeb said. “Instead of declassifying documents that reflect decades-old technologies used by witnesses with no scientific expertise, it would be far better to deploy state-of-the-art recording devices, such as wide-field cameras on telescopes or audio sensors, at the sites where the reports came from and search for unusual signals.”

“A scientific expedition focused on reproducing old reports would be far more valuable in unraveling the mysteries behind them,” Loeb added. “Its most important purpose would be to inject scientific rigor and credibility into the discussion.”

If we apply Occam’s razor, there are much simpler explanations for what has been harassing the American fleet. There are two that stand out. Some of the UAPs could be high-performance drones that some foreign power—that is to say, Russia or China—is using to spy on U.S. forces.

There’s ample precedent. Consider Iran’s own UFO fever starting more than a decade ago. Repeated sightings of speedy, unidentified flying objects got the Iranian air force so worked up that it sent its best planes, American-made F-14s, to investigate.

Tragically, one of those F-14s crashed in January 2012, killing both crew. Many Iranians genuinely believed a UFO had shot it down.

Tehran came around to the idea that its UFOs were, in fact, American spy drones. It undoubtedly helped Iranian officials reach that conclusion when, in December 2011, a U.S. Air Force Sentinel drone—a flying wing that’s not unlike a small-scale, pilotless B-2 stealth bomber—crashed on the Iran-Afghanistan border, apparently while surveilling Iranian nuclear facilities.

Flash forward a decade. Drones are faster, more maneuverable and harder to detect than ever before. The Air Force has quietly deployed a scaled-up spy drone that’s similar to the Sentinel but even more sophisticated. The so-called RQ-180 might have broken cover late last year when a photographer in California spotted something flying high overhead.

It’s entirely within the realm of possibility that Russia or China, or both, possesses new spy drones of its own. It’s obvious why these countries would send their drones to snoop around American ships and planes. It’s less obvious how these drones could outfly the Navy’s supersonic fighters.

But then, the more elusive UAPs might not be drones. Or, for that matter, anything at all. The other most plausible explanation for UAPs is that they’re sensor artifacts. Weird blips on the screens of multi-million-dollar radars and infrared scanners whose fidelity is so great that they might sometimes manifest objects that aren’t really there.

Even if drones and sensor artifacts can’t account for all UAPs, there’s no good reason to leap to aliens as an explanation, Wade Roush, a science lecturer and author of the nonfiction book Extraterrestrials, told The Daily Beast.

“It might turn out that there's a tiny residue of truly unexplained cases,” Roush said. “For some of those cases the extraterrestrial hypothesis might be one of the last ones you're left with. But I predict that this residue will be vanishingly small. And even after investigators have ruled out a bunch of other explanations, ‘aliens’ is still so far-fetched that it's just about the last possibility you'd want to consider. It's only slightly more plausible than ‘time-travelers’ or ‘Atlanteans.’”

But Varnum for one said he appreciates why so many people are eager to see the UAPs as off-world visitors.

Life on Earth is hard. The more that climate change, a global fascist resurgence and the ongoing pandemic drag us down, the more we look to the stars for escape. “It creates some sense of mystery and excitement in the world,” Varnum said.

Just because we want to believe in UFOs doesn’t mean we should, however. If it’s aliens you want, try following the actual scientific discipline that is the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. SETI scientists truly believe they’re on the cusp of discovering alien life.

“Within 20 to 30 years we’ll have space telescopes… that are going to be able to detect biosignatures in the atmospheres of exo-planets,” Douglas Vakoch, who heads the METI International research organization in San Francisco, told The Daily Beast. METI stands for “Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence.”

Luis Elizondo, Former Director of the Pentagon’s Aerospace ID Program, Says Some UFOs Still ‘Defy Explanation’

An exo-planet is just a faraway planet. There are uncountable millions of them. Once we can efficiently scan them for life, the search for alien life could accelerate. A lot. “There’s no reason not to know by 2050, one way or another,” Vakoch said.

If and when we do know, it’ll be because of clear, verifiable evidence based on repeatable experimentation. No fleeting glimpses of odd objects on Navy radar screens. No breathless testimony from spooked pilots. No ambiguous government reports.

There’s probably life out there. But it’s almost certainly not taking joyrides around our aircraft carriers.