Total Pageviews
Saturday, 6 September 2025
Friday, 5 September 2025
You Want To Know WHO/WHAT Might Be Behind The UFOs?
£20.00
Prints in 3-5 business days
http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooperscharf/ufo-contact/paperback/product-23719040.html
Since 1947 it has been claimed that UFOs/flying saucers are evidence of aliens visiting the Earth. Since the 1950s claims of encounters with landed craft and alien beings were talked about but not taken seriously.
In the 1960s the subject of UFO abduction was a "slow-burner" until the whole "Grey" abduction phenomenon and claims made by researchers such as Budd Hopkins, Prof. John Mack and Dr David Jacobs and Whitley Streiber.
But is there evidence to back up any of the claims -and what about those encountering Alien Entities but who were not abducted?
Are these people all hoaxers, psychotic or suffering from some other mental illness as some claim?
Are those people who were exposed by Ufologists against their wishes, people who wanted to report what happened and then just get back to their everyday lives -thrust into the media glare against their will?
And if US authorities were so interested that in one case at least they broke into the home of two abductees and this was later proven -why?
Why did a hard core of these people never want publicity or to make money from what happened to them?
Above all, why did a major UFO landing incident take place on a US Inbterstate road in front of a large number of observers (all willing to talk to investigators) never get investigated? If it were not for a radio presenter interviewing and taking notes we would know nothing of the case -it would be labelled "insubstantial".
James and Coral Lorenzen -the Scopolamine Kids; using a very notorious "truth drug" on alleged UFO witnesses and selling stories to newspapers. An investigator (a veteran) showing a witness images of "aliens" encountered in other cases before any memories were retrieved. Worst of all, the constant "pissing competition" and breaches of trust between UFO investigators.
Fully illustrated with drawings, maps and photographs some very rare or previously unpublished.
220 pages
A4
perfect bound
paperback
Fully illustrated with photographs and illustrations
£20.00 (excl. VAT)
A must read for those with a serious interest in UFOs Some of the contents:
The Nottinghamshire UFO Crash of 1987…or 1988
The Llandrillo ‘Saucer’ and
Strange
UFO Abductees and Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome
The UFO That Landed On
My Encounters With The Men In Black
A Previously Un-noted Alien Entity Type
Early 20th Century
Close Encounter with a Boggart
Some Odd and Unusual Cases
Rosa Lotti and the Happy Entities
The Strange Case of the Woollaton Gnomes and the Mince-pie Martians
What Happened on the
The ‘Lost’ Belgian UFO Landing Case
Strange Aliens from Outer Space?
Encounter with Black Aliens and Landed UFO
A4
B&W
350 pp
Fully illustrated containing photographs and maps
£20.00
Beyond UFO Contact i the fourth book in the groundbreaking series looking at reports of Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Alien-Entity reports from around the world and reassessing these. In addition there is a look at the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligences (SETI) and its relevance to the UFO phenomenon.
contents list:
Introduction: The Path of Counter-Actuality
1. Dionisio Llanca: Truck Driver, UFO Abductee and Human Guinea Pig
2. Aliens -What Can We Expect?
3. The Moreland Incident
4. It Is All Fake: Ufology Needs To Be Reassessed
5. Warminster UFOs and Entity Reports
6. Have Things Changed Since 1977?
7. The Beausoleil Cas -Even Aliens Like Theatre
8. The Pwca
9. Contact...with the Vegetable Alien
10. The Casitas Dam UFO Photograph and Entity
11. The Crystal Lake Encounter
12. The Humanoids at South Riverand the Luczkowich Encounter
13. Harrison Bailey
14. Sonny DesVerger
15. The UFO "Borderline"-The Imjarvi Skiers
16. Some Interesting Reports to Note
17. Dead Aliens in Photographs
18. Ufology, Government Cover Ups and Disclosure
19. The Reports That You Might Not Want To Look Into
20. Conil de la Frontera -a Credible Report?
21. Eighteenth Century Aliens?
22. Clearview Ranch
23. The Pat McGuire Case
24. Piero Fortunato Franzetta
25. The Silbury Hill Encounter
26. The Bridge Abduction
27. The Bagshot Heath UFO Incident
28. Lurkers and Alien Disinterest
29. What If YOU See Aliens Land?
30. So What Would YOU Do If You Encountered A Landed UFO?
____________________________________________________________
Wednesday, 3 September 2025
Sunday, 31 August 2025
So Nothing Is Happening?
AE/CE3K blog had 8,176 views last month.
Saturday, 30 August 2025
Really? Just Two??
I had to laugh as I realised that there was a Followers tab and after a couple decades and 955828 views and 2089 posts...I have two followers.
But then, out of the 955828 views how many led to book sales? Zero so wake up calls to reality can be fun.
"Why do you consider people who claim alien encounters t to be liars or fakes?" (I Don't)
"Why do you consider people who claim alien encounters t to be liars or fakes?"
Asking that question means that you have never read any of the five books that I have published on the subject. What I have clearly stated is that an account from one person with no corroboration cannot be considered as evidence. Do I read or listen to those accounts? Of course I do because they may not offer proof but there could be aspects that only someone who studies these cases recognise.
Most You Tubers put out "alien abduction" or UFO videos for one reason and one reason only; they get a lot of views. Views means money so the fact that they spin out a tale proven to have been a hoax 50 years ago does not matter. The fact that when they do tend to stick to facts and a case is very clearly sleep paralysis or an altered state incident they say that the case can be dismissed as such "but this isn't the case" with no evidence to state why it isn't.
Many cases are psychological in nature where the person involved only "realises that they are a life long UFO abductee" after reading a book on the subject. Things then spin out of control as I have shown so many times on this blog and in my books. The fact that images of a "Grey" alien in a book leads them to say "That's it! Tat's what I saw!"but when asked to draw or describe the "alien" they saw they come up with different details to the image they saw. There are, at my last counting, 20 all different images of a "true grey". Read Many Shades of Grey https://aeceiiikp.blogspot.com/2022/11/many-shades-of-greys.html
"Why would these people lie about such a thing?" Money. Notoriety. TV appearances -the list goes on. The other reason is because they believe what they are reporting and there are many examples of this (check out my first book for an explanation of "Ruth Syndrome"). They are NOT "mental" in any way and Ruth Syndrome appears to be something that affects people in all walks of life. Ufologists are just playing at looking for the truth behind UFOs and most are not equipped to fill in a report form themselves. So knowing about psychology and "other stuff" is of no interest and they will even tell percipients that they only saw what they thought they saw because it was a "screen image" planted in their memory to hide the fact that Greys were involved😒
I have cited cases involving just one percipient (again showing that those asking the afore mentioned question have never read my books).. Low credibility but then how does one explain all the symptoms of radiation poisoning in someone picking blackberries in the middle of the countryside? Some ground traces on examination could not be explained by official investigators (NOT Ufologists). At the same time as the person has their brief encounter and passes out people in the area hear strange sounds, an unknown object -also seen by people in cars some distance from the encounter site. All reported as flying saucer sightings before the actual entity encounter is known. That bumps up credibility somewhat. You take each case as reported and look at the facts as well as, if you can, communicate with the percipient.
What people are ignoring in my books (which they have not read!) is that I am presenting cases that are hard or impossible to explain away. Where there are secondary witnesses to an object flying above a car as well as physiological effects and even some trace evidence. There are some very little known cases in which details corroborate details in later cases yet the original report was unknown and not published. It is how you can find corroboration about entity appearances not noted before.
Small, dome headed entities were known before the whole "Grey" explosion but they were NOT "Greys" and they were not carrying out generational abductions and including here past life abductions and "in the womb" incidents. Why do people not take Ufology seriously? Also, anyone who claims to be a 25, 35 or 40 years "UFO veteran" and have no ideas or interest in entity cases is a total waste of space.
Present a data base of credible (as credible as it can be) evidence for encounters and just hope that people or even people in the scientific community have enough interest to read, maybe even double check sources.
It is 50 years since I started out looking at these cases and back in the 1970s Adamski and contactees were still given far more credibility that UFO percipients.
Sadly, not much has changed.
Tuesday, 26 August 2025
60 years of mystery: Warminster Thing celebrated with anniversary conference
Report from The Warminster Journal https://warminsterjournal.co.uk/60-years-of-mystery-warminster-thing-celebrated-with-anniversary-conference/
Warminster marked six decades of unexplained phenomena this weekend as UFO enthusiasts and historians gathered at the Athenaeum for the 60th anniversary conference of the Warminster Thing.
The all-day event on Sunday 24th August featured expert talks, historical accounts of the original sightings, and discussions exploring the broader mysteries connected to the series of mysterious sky sightings and unexplained phenomena reported in Warminster during the 1960s and 70s.
“The first part of the day was about the history, the personal accounts of what happened 60 years ago,” said organiser Stuart Dike. “The second part focused on the ancient mysteries connected to the Thing. We’ve achieved a fantastic balance and everyone really enjoyed it.”
The conference featured a wide range of speakers, including Stuart Dike as host, UFO researchers and authors Steve Wills and John Hanson, paranormal investigator Steve Rider, crop circle and UFO researcher ‘Busty’ Taylor, musician Brian McMullan Jr from Scottish band C.E.IV, and earth energies expert and author Maria Wheatley. Stalls selling books and merchandise added to the atmosphere, with around 120 tickets sold.

The conference follows the unveiling earlier this month of a new mural to mark the 60th anniversary. Located on a wall in the central car park, the colourful artwork features UFOs and a portrait of Arthur Shuttlewood, the Warminster Journal reporter who first documented the sightings. Local artist Paul Boswell created the mural, which was funded by the Heart of Warminster community group through crowdfunding.
The story of the Warminster Thing began on 25th December 1964, when multiple residents reported hearing a strange noise, with one witness, Marjorie Bye, describing it as a ‘sonic attack’ while walking to a church service. Over the following months, reports of unusual lights and shapes in the sky continued, attracting local and national attention. Arthur Shuttlewood, a journalist for the Warminster Journal, began reporting on the phenomenon in early 1965 and later published several books on the subject while contributing to documentaries and UFO research. Key milestones included a public meeting in August 1965 attended by over 200 residents and the famous photograph of a UFO taken by Gordon Faulkner, which was submitted to the Warminster Journal and featured in national newspapers.
Since then, Warminster has remained a focus for UFO enthusiasts, with a 50th anniversary event in 2015.






.jpg)


