Below are all the main file report folders regarding Alien Entities and CE IIIK encounters I have accumulated since 1977. Eight contain UK reports.
In the main the report summaries from every corner of the globe up until the 1990s (see explanation that follows ib main text) can contain a paragraph, page or several pages -all with references. Second from the left on the bottom shelf is the United States folder.
There are many old cases that have never been trabslated into English will probably not be in this data base. What follows is part of a document sent out to some European, Mexican and US Ufologists. If you are a serious researcher then here is your opportunity to help complete a permanent database for research.
Please contact me via blacktowercg@hotmail.com
Humanoid Close Encounter Of The Third Kind (CE IIIK)
Catalogue
Terry Hooper-Scharf
Anomalous Observational Phenomena Bureau
Note: (“AE” seemed to be non-commital in the sense that it
was not claiming extra-terrestrial or other origins for what were reported as
living entities just stating these things were “Alien” or strange to us in
every day life)
Brief Introduction
When I first got interested in the subject of UFOS, around
1973, it was still quite common to refer to these as “flying Saucers” and if
you even thought about considering the possibility that any living creature
might be in these objects, well, you were a “bit odd”.
In fact, it was still accepted that George Adamski and his
Venusians, Martians, Saturnians and others were “genuine” despite the accounts
have huge indicators in them that screamed “hoax”. Other Contactees were also still accepted.
I recall discussing what I termed “Alien Entity” with the
UKs oldest flying saucer group –the British Flying Saucer Bureau (BFSB) which
was an amalgam of the Flying Saucer Club and UK branch of the International
Flying Saucer Bureau set up by Albert K. Bender. The reaction was derisory laughter because
these reports “tend to come from crackpots or people who are hallucinating”
–the BFSB up until the late 1980s still held George Adamski to be a truthful
contactee with denizens of other planets.
The only helpful response I got was from the BFSBs long time
Director of Investigation and Research (a job I later took on) Graham F. N.
Knewstub. Graham was towing the BFSB line but made it clear that if such
reports existed then they did need to be looked into seriously. The BFSB had, in its early newsletter, Flying
Saucer News, briefly reported on a couple of UK CE IIIK/AE cases but to my
shock they had not been thoroughly investigated –rather discarded.
Franklyn A. Davin-Wilson was a BFSB Committee Member who did
encourage investigation and even set me off pursuing cases that had creature
but no UFO reported. Like Graham
Knestub, Franklyn suggested that I contact the two foremost UFO groups in the UK : Contact UK and the British UFO Research
Association (BUFORA).
At BUFORA, only Norman Oliver, who had investigated a number
of AE cases including a possible abduction during World War II (Albert
Lancashire), was willing to support work looking at such cases. But BUFORA as a
whole looked on “humanoid”/”Alien” sightings as “not kosher”.
When US
researcher Ted Bloecher asked for the UK section of his Hum-Cat (Humanoid
Catalogue) to be up-dated in the late 1970s, he turned to BUFORA who were
totally lost until the Director of Research pointed out that I kept a catalogue
of such cases. And so I up-dated the UK
section of Hum-Cat –for which BUFORA took full credit.
BUFORA were, in fact, not much help at all.
Contact UK
were far more open to AE accounts but investigation was not good. Brinsley Le Poer Trench (Lord Clancarty) told
me that there had been, in the mid 1960s, a case similar to that of Antonio
Villas Boas that was handed to Contact UK to investigate. At the time the AVB case was unknown in the UK . When I asked Contact UK if I could
see its case report I was told that they could not find one or any reference to
the abductee, Eugene Brown but just had basic details.
Ufology in the UK became embroiled in a war
between “New Ufologists” who thought it was “all psychological” and the “nuts
and bolts ETH” faction. In fact, New Ufologists seemed to twist or even alter
sections of reported cases to suit whatever theory they had at the time or
article/book they were trying to sell.
Seeing “prominent UFO investigators” state in magazines, on
TV and on radio that UFOs were all psychological stopped a lot of people
reporting UFO sightings because they were frightened of being called “mental”
–and if you were a “nut-case” for reporting a UFO what were you if you reported
a UFO and landing and AEs?
And I can tell you this because I spoke to more than a few
people put in that position. I met one
woman in her thirties who had life long experiences seeing UFOs and perhaps
even an AE on one occasion. She was
passed from UFO group to group and when I inquired about her from one group I
was told “she’s not all there in the head”.
In fact, I examined her face after one incident –it was swollen and red
and quite warm on one side only.
Correspondence she sent me echoed things that have only come to light in
US cases since the 1990s –but this was in the 1970s.
Another woman in her thirties had various sightings and at
least two encounters since childhood.
Again, mocked and not taken seriously but I spent a great deal of time
talking to her and her husband. Fellow
Ufologists even attempted to prevent investigation by stating I was having an
affair with the woman –but I learnt a lot from police methods. Any interview was either with her husband
present or at my grand parents home where I lived so there was no possibility
of an “affair”. The woman was married
but it made no difference to my colleagues who wanted her gone from the scene
because AE reports were “total rot and rubbish –she’s unhinged!”
In the 1970s I began noting in articles for the BUFORA Journal
and other publications, the number of “Time Lapse” cases. BUFORA were not going to accept that. In fact, when it came to the Betty and Barney
Hill case I was even told the cases couldn’t be taken seriously –“Come on, it’s
a white woman married to a black man!”
It turned out that BUFORA had a few totally un- investigated
Time Lapse (or “Missing Time”) cases but when I tried to follow them up the
witnesses wanted nothing further to do with UFO investigators.
The UK
was also getting mixed bag reporting from its UFO/flying saucer
publications. Cases from Europe known by investigators in the countries involved
to be hoaxes or true psychological cases, were reported as genuine and defying
explanation –even though it is known those publications knew the true
explanation.
I have a dozen or so of the big Lever Arch files that
contain reports from around the world of AEs.
These reports vary from a sentence (all that was published in English)
to paragraph or page or several pages in some cases. Summaries are placed in
these of books dealing with specific encounters such as the Hills, Travis
Walton, etc.
I have been lucky in that noted researchers outside the UK
have been able to furnish information on cases from their countries such as Luis R. Gonzalez and
Anders Liljegren –the information being sent in English language format
means accounts in English language publications can be accurately corrected for
researchers.
The Catalogue/Data
Base
The idea of the Humanoid
Close Encounter Of The Third Kind (CE IIIK) Catalogue is to try to build up
as complete as possible a data base of case summaries in the English
language. As it is hoped that Italian,
Spanish, German, French, Nederlands and other countries researchers will
cooperate there was to be a common language used. English seems to best option since it allows
me to coordinate and, if a researcher from, say, Spain asks what cases I have
from that country I can list these and if necessary scan the report entries (which
would contain location, date, time, report summary, sources, etc).
These scans would be free of charge, obviously, this is absolutely
not a project to make money but a research project. It makes sense than a data base that covers
many countries and to which many researchers contribute should be in English
and free
of any charge –the idea of charging a “fee for services” appals me slightly!
But we need to first work out certain aspects –I’ll go
through some of these now.
Since Budd Hopkins’ Missing Time, TV, movies and popular
culture has resulted in an explosion of reported “abductions” involving
“Greys”. The fact that these “Greys”
tend to vary in description has not worried many it seems. The artists, under
guidance from investigators, produce a number of interpretations of “Greys” all
of which are described as “the standard Grey alien” –even illustrations of
Betty and Barney Hills
According to Hopkins and Dr David M. Jacobs, both of whom I
have corresponded with, they estimate a “conservative 2% of the world’s human
population” has been abducted –a generational event. The current Earth population of humans stands
at +/- 7.3 billion. So if 2% of this figure consists of abductees
then that means there are 146,000,000 million abductees. All, we are told, abducted by The Greys who
were, up until the 1980s, not really known –the idea that they all look like
Whitley Streiber’s alien on the cover of Communion is not really born out my
some witness illustrations that vary and the use of hypnosis has not help
spread anything but confusion.
We have “missing foetus syndrome” –exploited in way by some
UFO researchers yet was more than adequately explained by veteran Ufologist Ann
B. Druffel (Druffel. A/ 1991. “”Missing Foetus” Case Solved.” MUFON Journal
283:8-12). Up until the work of Hopkins
and then Jacobs I am unaware of any cases of women abducted, impregnated and
who lose the foetus –let alone huge chambers filled with a vast number of
foetuses floating in “embryonic fluid”.
Whether we are dealing with a mass psychosis or something
else, which in previous non-UFO generations was symbolised by faeries, “the old
hag” or whatever, the exploitation of these people for the “next big angle” in
alien abductions continues. It has gone
from generational abductions (ie: the great grand mother, the grand mother then
the daughter and her daughter are all abductees) to even accounts of seeing
Greys “pre-birth” and even in “previous lives”.
Now we are told, by Dr Jacobs and many others that the alien hybrids
have taken control and are amongst us (Jacobs, Walking Among Us: The Alien Plan
To Control Humanity, Disinformation Books Ltd, 2015).
Most UFO investigators are not prepared for what the task
involves –once an alleged alien abductee is taken on as a case that
investigator has a duty of care to insure they are helped rather than exploited
for a file/book or whatever. It has
developed in such way that abductee cases are being investigated by other
abductees or “Experiencers” depending on what slant they look at these cases
from.
So, the new abductee, having read books or seen a TV
programme about UFO abductions is now told what happened to them and
they add things from this which others say “that’s just like me!” And worse are the number of abductees who
read all the books by Hopkins
or Jacobs and the material subconsciously builds up.
The question is: should
these cases be included in a data base proposed here? Or should there simply be an entry for cases
we know of such as:
“Jon Smith Reports
that he has been abducted since a child by Greys”
Followed by a source reference or group/investigator contact
info? Maintaining a data base with full
case history of every person claiming to have been abducted by Greys would
require a warehouse.
Firstly, I think the best idea is to up-date a data base
with all reports made prior to Hopkins ’
books or TV series such as Dark Skies, The X-Files, et al. So up to 1985?
Then cases would be added that are reported after that date
that refer to AEs that do not match the standard Greys abduction scenario
unless the entities look similar but there are either multiple witnesses
(unknown to each other), physical traces that have been investigated or other
factors -?
Format. I would
suggest Word Doc. Files for each case for a simple reason. If the case reports are in English then a
researcher in Italy or Germany could, if necessary, copy and paste from Word
Doc. To something like Google Translate –not perfect I know but possibly the
best we can do at present.
The biggest problem would be in getting a researcher from
any country involved who would be responsible for gathering and translating the
reports into English for the data base.
Not perfect English because corrections can be made.
The stance of the AOP B and this catalogue is simple: it has
to be impartial. If witnesses simply report a UFO and AE –no more- then that is
what it is classed as: we have nothing to state with 100% certainty the
origins. If an abductee states he/she
were told the abductors were from outer space, another dimension or where ever
then that is stated in the report –because unless we can prove other wise who
are we to argue?
If a case is believed to be a hoax or even a psychological
case or perhaps even a mis-identification of something, the investigator needs
to note this along with reasons why he/she suspects or has proven this.
Is this workable? If
researchers from different countries cannot cooperate on this project in 2015
and beyond then then we really are in a mess.
We need to sort out fact from sensationalism. Give ourselves a solid data base we can build
on because apart from the Grey obsessed UFO groups/investigators and
sensationalist TV programmes and magazine articles we have no other sources
–whose information can we trust?
That is the long winded proposal. All that is needed now is for, I hope,
Ufologists to spread the word and contribute.
Please contact me via email if you have any questions and
thank you!
No comments:
Post a Comment