Total Pageviews

Thursday, 31 December 2020

Beyond UFO Contact: Alien from Mind, Time & pace

 

A4

B&W

350 pp

Fully illustrated containing photographs and maps

£20.00

https://www.lulu.com/en/en/shop/terry-hooper/beyond-ufo-contact-aliens-from-mind-time-space/paperback/product-qw8wjm.html?page=1&pageSize=4


Beyond UFO Contact i the fourth book in the groundbreaking series looking at reports of Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Alien-Entity reports from around the world and reassessing these. In addition there is a look at the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligences (SETI) and its relevance to the UFO phenomenon. 

contents list: 

Introduction: The Path of Counter-Actuality 

1. Dionisio Llanca: Truck Driver, UFO Abductee and Human Guinea Pig 

2. Aliens -What Can We Expect? 

3. The Moreland Incident 

4. It Is All Fake: Ufology Needs To Be Reassessed 

5. Warminster UFOs and Entity Reports 

6. Have Things Changed Since 1977? 

7. The Beausoleil Cas -Even Aliens Like Theatre 

8. The Pwca 

9. Contact...with the Vegetable Alien 

10. The Casitas Dam UFO Photograph and Entity 

11. The Crystal Lake Encounter 

12. The Humanoids at South Riverand the Luczkowich Encounter 

13. Harrison Bailey 

14. Sonny DesVerger 

15. The UFO "Borderline"-The Imjarvi Skiers 

16. Some Interesting Reports to Note 

17. Dead Aliens in Photographs 

18. Ufology, Government Cover Ups and Disclosure 

19. The Reports That You Might Not Want To Look Into 

20. Conil de la Frontera -a Credible Report? 

21. Eighteenth Century Aliens? 

22. Clearview Ranch 

23. The Pat McGuire Case 

24. Piero Fortunato Franzetta 

25. The Silbury Hill Encounter 

26. The Bridge Abduction 

27. The Bagshot Heath UFO Incident 

28. Lurkers and Alien Disinterest 

29. What If YOU See Aliens Land? 

30. So What Would YOU Do If You Encountered A Landed UFO?

Wednesday, 30 December 2020

Anomalous Observational Phenomena Journal Vol. 2 No. 5 January 2021

 




A4

B&W

68pp

£5.00

https://www.lulu.com/en/en/shop/terry-hooper/anomalous-observational-phenomena-journal-vol-2-no-5-january-2021/paperback/product-gp4y8m.html?page=1&pageSize=4

The fifth Journal brings you the following articles -all fully referenced and illustrated: IN THIS ISSUE: 

Ufology: How Complex Must It Become? 

More Warminster Entity Reports  

Conil de la Frontera 

 Eighteenth Century Aliens? 

Harrison Bailey: A Classic Case of Ufology At Work  

CE3K/AE Reports: More Details Needed  

John Hanson’s Close Encounter  

The Flying Spectre of Natal  

The Bridge Abduction 

 1870: The First Ever UFO Photograph or Proof of Early Airships? 

 Did A UFO Crash In France in 1790? 

What Might Have Been: 2000 and The British Journal of Cryptozoology

 Just looking through my file for one with all my correspondence with the late Tommy Dunford when I came across another (fairly new) file from 2000.

The British Journal of Cryptozoology was about 28pp and covered...cryptozoology. I think the title gives the game away. However, I dropped the publication when I discovered what was actually going on wqithin the subject. Instead I went back to more normal wildlife and weirdness,




Beyond UFO Contact Almost There!



 Beyond UFO Contact is completed at 350 pp. I wa holding off in the hoppe that former BUFORA investigator David Sankey might respond to a query regarding the 1960s Milnthorpe case but as with most Ufologists (I believe he is now working as an artist) no one responds.

I have checked spelling and grammar as well as re-edited ome photos over 10 times since the end of November and if it is not ready now it never will be!
for those interested here is the contents list:
Introduction: The Path of Counter-Actuality 3
1. Dionisio Llanca: Truck Driver, UFO Abductee and Human Guinea Pig 8
2. Aliens -What Can We Expect? 20
3. The Moreland Incident 29
4. It Is All Fake: Ufology Needs To Be Reassessed 48
5. Warminster UFOs and Entity Reports 62
6. Have Things Changed Since 1977? 88
7. The Beausoleil Cas -Even Aliens Like Theatre 98
8. The Pwca 104
9. Contact...with the Vegetable Alien 108
10. The Casitas Dam UFO Photograph and Entity 113
11. The Crystal Lake Encounter 118
12. The Humanoids at South Riverand the Luczkowich Encounter 124
13. Harrison Bailey 136
14. Sonny DesVerger 154
15. The UFO "Borderline"-The Imjarvi Skiers 183
16. Some Interesting Reports to Note 192
17. Dead Aliens in Photographs 203
18. Ufology, Government Cover Ups and Disclosure 213
19. The Reports That You Might Not Want To Look Into 216
20. Conil de la Frontera -a Credible Report? 228
21. Eighteenth Century Aliens? 243
22. Clearview Ranch 248
23. The Pat McGuire Case 272
24. Piero Fortunato Franzetta 284
25. The Silbury Hill Encounter 297
26. The Bridge Abduction 304
27. The Bagshot Heath UFO Incident 312
28. Lurkers and Alien Disinterest 321
29. What If YOU See Aliens Land? 336
30. So What Would YOU Do If You Encountered A Landed UFO? 347
Will upload tomorrow so that the book ought to be done and dusted by 1st January 2021

Monday, 28 December 2020

Why the multiverse is religion, not science.

Did We Just Detect a New "Wow" Signal from Proxima Centauri?

Robin Cole, Circular Forum and the 1995 Bridge Abduction Case

  Note: If Robin Cole or anyone who knows him could ask him to contact me I would appreciate it. 

The full report and images will be published in AOP Journal no. 5 as well as Beyond UFO Contact in January 2021

 *******************************************************************

   In 1996 I was in touch with Robin Cole who headed the Circular Forum group based in Gloucestershire and that in turn led to my involvement in the Gotherington Gargoyle case (The Case of the Gotherington Gargoyle, in Some Things Strange & Sinister). Knowing of my interest in CE3K reports, Cole asked whether I would be interested in looking at an abduction report they had on file. Obviously, my answer was “yes.”

 

   What I received was slightly shocking because, despite my reputation, I would not have expected to find the address, telephone number and percipient’s name unredacted.  As it happens it may just be that I am the only person who now has the full report.

 

   In-keeping with the report in the group magazine I identify the percipient as “Mr. X”.

 

   At around 21:40 hrs on the 15th February, 1995, Mr. X was driving along the M50 and heading home from work when he noticed a bright object travelling at speed over the countryside. The object was heading in his direction but he lost sight of it as the road cuts through a hill at that point in his journey and a bridge blocked his view. Once he had driven under the bridge he was confronted by the object which was approximately 80 feet above the road but then descended to around 50 feet as he continued 250 yards from the bridge.

 

   As Mr. X strained to see just what the object was he describes himself as suddenly becoming “docile”. Then “a voice from within” told him to pull over to get a better look and he did so.  His next recollection was being in the middle lane in third gear and travelling at around 50 mph and a voice was telling him to “Keep going, there is no traffic, keep going.” Not much further along was the junction he would normally take but he pulled off of the road and got out of the car. He was unsure whether he had been involved in an accident of some kind but on checking his car was undamaged.

 

   On checking, he found that some 40 minutes had passed and he had no recollection of anything during that period. His journey home normally took twenty minutes but on this night it had taken just over an hour and on getting home told his son about the experience.  That was the end of an odd event until he started having vivid flashbacks and odd things upset him. While treating his wooden fence two slanted black knots in the timber frightened him and yet he could not understand why.  He was equally shaken by the motif of two black, slanted wings on his son’s motorbike.

 

   By 1996, Mr. X decided that he needed to contact someone which is when he contacted Cole. According to Cole; “We now have over forty pages relating to this case” yet the “full report” I was sent has only 15 pages which is 25 pages short of what Cole claimed. He did state that the late Tony Dodd had seen the report and a copy had been sent to Professor John Mack for his analysis and, at the time of the Circular Forum article a copy was in the hands of Nick Pope. However, as only 15 pages are available we are lucky that this includes Mr. X’s original account which adds much more to the report and I have left the spelling etc. intact:

 

      “…I left work at exactly 9.30 p.m. in the evening to go home…the journey

      which I take home is about 9.25 miles. I have been travelling this road for 7

      years. The same route every day.  This journey should take no more than 15

      minutes maximum.  It consists of 1.8 mile bypass to M50 at Ross-on-Wye,

      3.75 miles motorway M50 and 4 miles on the Newent/Gorsley B4221. I

      arrived at the roundabout at the M50 Travellers Rest end at approximately 9.40

      p.m.  It was dark but clear. I looked across the valley through a gap in the hedge

      towards Ponts Hill. On the far horizon about 10-12 miles, low down was a large

      bright light in an otherwise star less night sky.”

 

   The account now gets a little confusing as the continuation of Mr. X’s account refers to a previous sighting but then jumps slightly. I assume that the next part takes up the narrative from after Mr. X had lost sight of the object due to the bridge and then saw it above the road:

 

      “I don’t know whether this was a hole in the underside of the craft. There was

      no noise (not helicopter or plane). The light as bin the first sighting completely

      enveloped the craft.  It appeared flurescent a bit like aqn aura around the outside

      of the craft.  But it shimmered when you looked at5 it.  I only had a few seconds

       to see this and estimated that it was about 80 ft. above me and about 2 bus

      lengths wide (diameter). I am now fidgeting about in the car as the light is

      bothering me.  All of a sudden I hear a voice in my head saying   “Pull over and

      you can get a better look!”

 

     “I went from worrying about the light and being agitated to totally docile

      looking straight ahead not at all concerned about the encroaching light that

      was descending on me.  I looked along the hard shoulder for a safe place to

      stop as I had been told.  At this point the hard shoulder4 disappears and a small

      road runs underneath the motorway. A barrier with warning posts appears in

      front of me. A voice warns “Unsafe! Unsafe!” as I start to pull over.  I straighten

      up the car taking notice of the voice.  I am sure these voices are some sort of

      telepathy.  It’s as if they can see through my eyes everything that is going on,

      and are guiding me.  I am under some form of hypnotic control. I can see

      everything that is going on but I have to obey the voice.

 

     “From the bridge to this point it takes about 20-25 seconds everything is

      happening very quickly.  The craft has to descend between two rock faces

      and position itself above my car as well as fitting between the four lanes

      carriagway.  It is large but has fantastic control.  It is at this point I think I

      was abducted. It was as if I blinked my eyes and I was back again. The only

      thing I can compare this with is if you are watching a very good film and it

      jumps a frame. You notice something but because you are engrossed in the

      story it appeares continues.”

 

   I believe in that last line Mr. X meant “continuous” and I should also note here that a bus length is around 30-35 feet depending on the model so the object seen by Mr. X was approximately 60-70 feet in diameter.  In the 1994 Silbury Hill case Paul and Sonya also believed that entities were “using” their eyes to see things.  Mr. X continues:

 

      “I am now looking straight ahead on the same bit of road. The car is in gear

      now (5th) I am doing about 50 m.p.h. I am still not bothered about the light. 

      Everything appears normal and another voice says; ‘Don’t stop now! Keep

      going. There is no traffic either side of the motorway. Keep going.’

 

      “I estimate it was between 5-10 seconds after this that I came out of the

      hypnotic state and the craft had gone.  They had released my mind. I

      exclaimed aloud ‘Where’s the light. Where’s the light.’ Not realising it was

      all over.  They had gone.  I continued driving as I was told but I was now

      completely conscious and in control. I noted there was no traffic what so ever

      as I had been told and I kept going.  When I reached the slip road at the

      Gorsley turn off (B4221) I stopped before turning on to the B4221 for Newent. 

      I put the hazard  lights on and got out of my car looked across the motorway

      at a small wood opposite.  I saw lights going down beyond the wood but could

      not swear that they were the same lights that had plagued me earlier.  Still no

      traffic.  I got back into my car. Put the hazard lights off put my seat belt on and

      then noticed my digital clock was reading 10-22 p.m. that meant that a 3.5 mile

      journey which would normally take 3-4 minutes took 40 minutes.  I remember

      feeling pleased when I saw the lights of a car coming from the Gorsley Golf

      Club. The first car I had seen since entering M50.  As the car passed I pulled

      out behind it but it turned right onto the motorway to Ross-on-Wye.

   

     “I continued home arriving at about 10-35 p.m. still wondering what had

      happened. The light still haunting me.  Which it does to this day.  I checked

      the car over and myself to see if I had been involved in any form of accident. 

      No damage to the car and no marks on my body.

 

     “The only explanation to the lack of traffic on the motorway and loss of

      Time would be if I had been taken when there was a lull in the traffic and put

      back there was a lull in the traffic 40 minutes being lost inside the craft for

      what purpose I do not know. My conclusion is I was taken by a F.F.O. similar

      or the same as described in my earlier sightings with its outer lights on.  This

      light acting as a type of strobe giving it a shimmering or pulsing effect, thus

      hypnotizing me, while taking  the car and myself up into its hull and then up

      into the sky and out of sight for 40 minutes to do whatever they had to do to

      me and then bringing me back to exactly the same spot on the motorway to

      continue my journey.

 

     “I think that U.F.O.’s are using motorways as easy access for abductions and

      now that the American Air-Force has gone its left the gate wide open for them

      to do what they want. Up until 1993 my first sighting where I saw two craft, I

      had never seen anything in 47 years of my life.

 

     “When I arrived home at about 10-35 p.m. my wife was in bed asleep so was

      my youngest son Stephen in his bed asleep. Andrew my eldest son was out

      with friends, Richard my mid son was laying on the settee watching T.V.

      (football) after the news had finished at 10-30 p.m. he was wearing his blue

      towling dressing gown. I hung my jacket up put my work bag down and went

      into the T.V. room to tell him about my incident with the light.  He was

      watching an action replay shot and asked me to be quite until he had seen it. 

      I then told him about this bright light and was bewildered at this time as to

      what it was. He can verify the time I got home about 10-35 p.m..

 

      “At no time do I remember stopping the car during the incident it

      appeared continues. Apart from the problem with the light (U.F.O.).”

 

   The interesting aspects of this account are what Ufologists tend to leave out because we read here what Mr. X was thinking at the time but also it shows that he was not “vague” afterwards. He notes that his wife and one son were asleep and that another was out with friends –he obviously checked this so he was “thinking straight”. He noted that Richard was watching a football replay on TV following the 22:00 hrs news and that he was wearing a blue dressing gown. He had also checked the car and himself for any damage or injuries.  Mr. X even managed to write out a sequence of events for the evening of 15th February:

 

1)      Clock out 9.30 p.m.

2)      Walk to car park (2 mins)

3)      Drive to M.50 using by-pass (5 min 30 secs)

4)      Entre M. 50 9.40 p.m. approximately

5)      First gap in hedge light on far horizon

6)      Second gap light streaking across valley

7)      I go under first motorway bridge

8)      Craft descends on me

9)      Open window of car and look up at craft

10)  Voice tells me to “Pull over and you can get a better look’

11)  Voice warning “Unsafe. Unsafe” as I go to pull over. Barrier in way

12)  Voice again “Don’t stop now. Keep going. There’s no traffic either side of the motorway keep going”

13)  Drive to slip road and junction B4221 at Gorsley 10.22 p.m.

14)  Drive home to Newent arrive 10.35 p.m.

 

   One morning at 04:00 hrs in 1993, Mr. X had looked across the yard (from where he worked?) and seen the Moon as well as two “flying saucers” although this appears to0 have been just a sighting with no missing time. With regards to the flash-backs of the 1995 incident Mr. X recalled being observed by entities  but also of being in a laying down position in a white room –oddly enough, for no known reason he eventually repainted the interior of the house white.

 

   The remark about the US Air Force no longer present refers to local bases used by them closing down or being used as “stop over” airfields. As I found out in the 1980s in conversations with USAF personnel there their presence had never seemingly been of any concern to “UFOs” locally.

 

   It would be nice to know what the “40 pages” contained especially since it was stated that; “At one point we became very concerned for the “abductees” health and safety, as it seemed he was suffering from post traumatic stress disorder directly as a result of his experience.”

 

   Without the necessary details it is difficult to gauge whether this was incident was a psychological or physical event.  Circular Forum suddenly became defunct and it was impossible to track Cole down though I did come across him on a ghost forum in which the “ghost hunter” Elliott O’Donnell was discussed. I was told Nick Pope had the full report but when I contacted him he was unsure -“I get sent so many things” which sort of ended my attempts to find out more.

 

   Mr X was 50 years of age in 1996 and would now (in 2020) be 74 years of age if still alive. Unless someone has a copy of the full report Cole indicates went to Tony Dodd (deceased), John Mack (deceased) or Nick Pope this is another case we have lost.

Saturday, 26 December 2020

Berwyn Mountains UFO -Want A Piece of Crashed UFO?

 Re. the Berwyn Mts 'UFO' crash which wasn't and Scott Felton's claims of me living in South Wales (never have) and being a government stooge (nope) and never heard of before (in his fantasy world he does NOT check links or other items sent to him showing him my involvment with UFOs going back to the 1970s) or Margaret Fry's utterly faked story -things I NEVER said and it is all in my book Some Things Strange and Sinister. This via John Hanson of the Haunted Skies project:

"The informant then sent Terry four silver fragments from the RAF man which was claimed to have been taken covertly from the debris which was taken to Porton Down, near Salisbury , Wiltshire a place that to the layman is sinisterly synonymous with germ warfare .Now known as Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Defence MOD. Terry gave the samples to two separate parties who promised they would analyse them but these were never returned.

The fourth some 2”x2” he sent to UFO researcher Margaret Ellen Fry. This arrived at her house on the 23.1.1997

Margaret; ”I gave this fragment to Roy Winch a family friend who was knowledgeable with aircraft components, both in the UK and the USA. He told me that it was not aluminium, lithium steel, iron and wasn’t magnetic The silver fragment was slightly pitted and scratched and was light as a feather, yet impossible to bend flatten or scratch. When we first had the fragment we noticed it showed complicated patterns of circles and at one time four three dimensional flourets which have now faded”



If you want a small piece of the metal to analyse it will cost you for said piece and the courier service to pick up the item because I am no lo0nger falling for the "must be lost in the post" story from people who then show the piece around.



The Need To Be Honest About The Future of Ufology

 

We need to be very honest about Ufology. It is dead. Since 1947 the mindset has been that of a social club where people meet, hear the latest news and listen to occasional guest speakers while those in charge try to raise more funds. Yes, there were some really dedicated people but they either gave up for various reasons or succumbed to self-deception.

 

Carol Rainey, who was married to Budd Hopkins and assisted him in his work reported ("The Co-Creation of the Abduction Phenomenon", Spectrum Radio Network 11th February, 2011) how, if she "challenged" Hopkins on an aspect of a case he was far from happy. Rainey, obviously, also knew David Jacobs and it was at a dinner in Jacobs' home one day that he leant across the table to Hopkins and told him "We are the only two people in the world who know the truth of what is going on." Rainey's draw dropped and she did question that stance and the response was not good.

 

Hopkins and Jacobs, as far as they were both concerned, could not be challenged on their work and this begins to explain what went wrong with Hopkins work as well as Jacobs; neither man would accept criticism of their work or even allow peer review or analysis of alleged materials from alien abductions (powders, stained clothes or 'implants') there was always a reason why they would not cooperate on this aspect.

We also know that Hopkins left out some aspects of accounts (as with the book Unseen) and then cherry-picked data and even went so far as to redraw symbols allegedly seen during abductions. He believed that he was on the right track so to heck with everyone else.

 

Jacobs, as I have noted before, went so completely off the deep end that if he were a medical professional he could well be struck off for his actions –telephone hypnosis sessions alone are high risk but, you know, what the hell: he “knows” what he is doing and now that Hopkins is dead Jacobs is the ONLY man who knows the truth (the “David Vincent” syndrome –named after the character from the 1960s TV show The Invaders).

 

Researchers in psychology distinguish “belief superiority” from “belief confidence” (thinking your opinion is correct). Belief superiority is relative; it is when you think your opinion is more correct than other people’s.  The top end of their belief superiority scale is to indicate that your belief is “Totally correct (mine is the only correct view)”. Hopkins and Jacobs fall into this last category.

 

So why did no Ufologists challenge them and their techniques and lack of any oversight or peer review? Well, Ufology is a kind of hive mentality club: you agree with everyone else or you are out. In the 1980s, t5hrough the efforts of two long standing MUFON members (who left MUFON when things started going wrong) I was persuaded to (all expenses paid) attend a MUFO)N symposium and give two talks on UK CE3K/AE research and how to proceed when such reports were received.  No problem even though I do not like public speaking or stepping into even the shadow created by the lime light!

 

When I heard no more I asked what was happening because I needed to prepare material. “You upset a few people. Deal’s off” I was told. Before “orbs” and all the other “current raves” you have to remember MUFON was drawing in money, TV and a lot of publicity based on the Grey Abduction hysteria. Apparently “someone” (a well known UK Ufologist and author I am told) sent MUFON copies of some of my articles which question methodology and certain cases. No. MUFON was NOT going to allow that.

 

You see, if you are not “part of the hive” you do not get any time at a conference or speak anywhere. We have seen that corruption of ethics and any pretence at scientific research vanish as (without the permission of investigators or witnesses) MUFON sold all of its UFO reports to Robert Bigelow –just as John Carpenter had sold his confidential files. Then MUFON was hit by claims that it was rigging data to go with the lat4est trend, racist rants from some higher ups, not to mention sexism…oh, and child sexual abuse claims.

 

If all you see is the TV shows then you think MUFON is a slick hard core scientific organisation. MUFON died a long time ago.

 

Back-biting, in-fighting, Ufologists hoaxing other Ufologists or adding faked reports into the system making any serious study highly flawed and pointless. Ufology was never a science just as “Bigfootology” and “Cryptozoology” and around 96% of current paranormal research is and was not a science.

 

When I started working on my first book, Some Things Strange and Sinister” it contained almost 40 years of research into some cases. The UFO related cases outlined showed just how much lying had been going on. Noted American Ufologists admitting openly that reports used since the 1960s were well known hoaxes or fantasy stories from well known “personalities” but were these exposed widely to prevent any serious researcher using them? No. They continued to be used –including by the people who knew they were fake.

 

With the second book, Some More Things Strange and Sinister I delved into other cases –there were interesting cases to note in all fields including Ufology- and these were not debunking books. If you find an explanation for a report then you have to make that known to prevent serious researchers using it and every one of my books is fully referenced so everything can be double-checked which is the best peer review can be with these subjects.

 

When it came to the first book entirely dedicated to SETI, CETI and CE3K/AE –UFO Contact?- I decide4d to go straight for the proverbial jugular and hit certain “classic” cases hard. After 40-60 years of debunking there should have been enough pro-con material to reassess these cases. Fake then I’d show why by using facts rather than “Oh, well so-and-so said it was true.” I double and triple checked the cases put forward by debunkers (not sceptics who assess evidence but people just out to disprove everything by fair or foul means) and…most of it turned out to be fake evidence, twisted truths and worse. I had to then double and triple check that these were not Ufologists!

 

I could dismiss a lot Ufologists claimed –I am sick to my back-teeth of hearing about the Betty Hill “star map” which is pointless. I as sick of hearing “He passed dud cheques” (debunkers, even most Ufologists failing to point out that these payments were honoured by the person in question) or had a record for “parking violations” and when you consider the dirty and not-quite-legal things the debunkers got up to there were some pretty bad double standards going on.

 

I waded through all of this and concluded –based on testimony and secondary witness reports as well as other factors- that certain reports seemed genuine. “No, I’m not having that –I’ve missed something!” I said to myself. I checked, checked and checked again. Same conclusion each time.  I had to stick with the results.

Let me make it clear that we do NOT have any physical artefact from a UFO. As you might expect because it is hard to steal something in most of the situations described. Unconnected people observing a UFO over the area where a claimed encounter took place, physiological and psychological effects and even trace evidence has to have a cause. Someone walking down a quiet country lane or through a jungle is not going to come into casual contact with high doses of radiation. Something has to have been seen or encountered to cause psychological shock in a person or even post traumatic stress disorder.

I prefer cases where there are secondary witnesses if not to entities then to the UFO involved –something that says yes, something did happen. I prefer cases involving two or more people and, preferably, a report not messed up by some idiot using hypnosis and forcing their own beliefs onto a percipient. Not some person who keeps details to themselves and only releases little snippets as and when they like. The percipient must be protected at all costs but initial and final FULL reports must be published for perusal by any serious scientists to look at.  Any and all hypnotic sessions MUST be recorded and made available. If we can see that no one is misleading us or stacking the decks somehow then we have something we can look at and build on.

When I realised that there were seemingly genuine incidents I began to look at others. I checked as I normally do and came up wi8th various trends and findings that –it seems- no one else has in Ufology. I was working alone and not connected to any group (most of who would not cooperate anyway) and just ignoring the Grey (or which ever alien Jacobs currently claims is the real power behind things…until the next one is discovered) abduction phenomenon –I did assess the various aspects involved in UFO Contact?- and looking at the reports.

Everything I came across and added to is fully referenced so anyone can come along and say “Let’s see if this is accurate” and can do their own work.

Ufology cannot just sit on its collective backsides and say “Jacobs is handling this” because he is NOT.  A pinpoint of light in the sky is a pinpoint of light in the sky and not proof of extraterrestrial space craft or even “back up evidence” to someone’s claim of being abducted by aliens.

Although, if these objects and those on board them are not from Earth, it leaves only one real conclusion outside of wild and sometimes fantastical speculation; they are from another planet. However, on that subject I have to remain neutral because there is nothing to show us which planetary system or planet. In fact, I do not even thing extra terrestrial when I study these reports because that would mean the research would get tainted. If I believe Betty and Barney Hill or Travis Walton, Zanfretta or any other percipient it is because there is a strong case not because I believe in extra terrestrial visitors.

If a percipient is told a planet of origin, the planetary system and how far from Earth it is then that can be checked to a degree –is it an exo-planet in a system we know of for instance. Earth is currently (and very likely will not be for hundreds of years) not a threat to any superior extra terrestrial civilization so one might hope that one day someone asks one of these entities; “Where you from, pal?”

Ufology is currently in its death throws but is in denial because admitting that affects certain power bases and definitely the money coming in. Will it ever change or just fade out to become an obscure fringe subject –no one can answer that. It is up to the individual Ufologist.

Me? Well, I’m doing the work and the results are there to read by anyone and with no seriously established publisher being involved the reach is not as wide as I might hope. Would I accept funding to continue the work? Like a shot.

 

Saturday, 19 December 2020

I am gone.

 When this blog disappears please remember that I started this blog in 2012 -nine years ago- and the response has been under-whelming.  Some 390,000 views and 30 comments which basically me chatting with a friend.

I had hoped that 2020 would see me posting some videos here on various reports I have looked into over 40+ years as well as some longer posts. But all of that takes time and my laptop died on me and I'm now using a PC that's in rapid decline. I needed support to keep things going.

Buy one of the books then at least you get something out of it and I can put the money into newer things (a You Tube channel was planned).

The response was...nothing.  1,500+ posts and all I saw were the people taking origuinal material and using it as their own -and getting comments and responses!

The reaction to In Pursuit the magazine was appalling. About three copies sold.

Well, you want unresearched fake and junk posts pretty soon you'll have the internet to choose from.

I gave it almost a decade. I tried. Pity no one was interested.

And this is my last post. Go to the AOP Face Book page or where ever. I am gone.

Thursday, 17 December 2020

It's....Beyond UFO Contact

 I have just finished the final editing on my fourth, possibly final, book on Close Encounters of the Third Kind or CE3K. Each book has looked at classic as well as little known cases but each is analyzed and all the sources are fully referenced so others can also look into them.

I look at how Ufology has treated percipients in these UFO encounters and if I can dig up new material I will.

Before Skinwalker Ranch there was Clearview. Never heard of it? Well buy the book and you will. UFOs, CE3Ks, Bigfoot and cattle mutilations.

Harrison Bailey -rarely reported on but Ann Druffel used the title “Harrison Bailey and the Flying Saucer Disease”. Controversial case and with a hiont of racism aimed at Bailey. In a very chunky chapter I look at the case and, in my opinion, finally give a conclusion and it should wake up a few Ufologists.

There are little known cases as well as cases that are often misrepresented online. There are over 320 pages so there’s a lot to read.

That includes a look at what official policies therte are shhould a flying saucer land, the position of the United Nations Out Space Affairs office and I answer the question; “What would YOU do if a UFO landed in front of you?”

There’s a smattering of SETI (Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence) too.

Book should be available soon!

Wednesday, 16 December 2020

Appeal re Photo

 Anyone with hardback copies of The Warminster Mystery and/.or More UFOs Over Warminster?

I'm looking to try to get a scan of a photo that appears in one of them -PM me if you have the books.
THANKS

Tuesday, 15 December 2020

Reminder

 Just to make it clear that when this blog goes there is the AOP Face Book page and you DO NOT have to join as it is public membership.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/467983846696626

Friday, 11 December 2020

UK Ufology & Survey


I was asked why I was not looking in greater detail at old UK CE3K/AE cases.  The answer to that is quite simply that from the mid 1970s on when "New Ufologists" (as they were to be called a few years later) came into the subject we had hoaxing. These people were so hypocritical in that if someone else slightly fumbled a case or were considered to have even slightly embellished a report then they were hounded. They were totally discredited by these people.

At the very same time these “New Ufologists” were, themselves, faking reports and incidents. As noted before, this was admitted and there was a firm refusal to declare which cases had been deliberately faked and as for an explanation as to why they did this -it was no one's business.  Not only does this totally discredit the entire New Ufology movement and those involved in it (because unless we know who did what everyone involved is tarnished) but it rendered serious UFO research dead. How could you carry out a report analysis or look for trends if you might be including anywhere from 3, 4, 5 or goodness knows how many fake reports amongst the data?

If you read the articles or books published by these ”New Ufologists” you begin to see how details in one varied from another –it was almost chopping and changing details to suit what theory they were pushing. In one noted 1970s report details changed no fewer than three times in summaries written by the same person.

In one “major case” it was noted how details changed so much that at times accounts had to be re-read to make sure one was not skipping past the start of another report summary.  

There were reports that appeared genuine yet these were being explained away. Ripperston Farm in Wales and the events going on there had one lie after another added to summaries –often emphasising hoaxers to shut down interest. Hoaxers that, it appears, over 40 years later have not been found to have existed.

Seeding themselves in UFO organisations and publications these people literally controlled what was being published and what was being published tended to come from people connected to them. Interesting research into infra red photography and UFOs had any publicity given to it stopped and articles blocked.

It was this major concern from people with a serious interest in UFOs that led to the AOP Bureau opening up a file that looked at specific “New Ufologists” and groups. Attempts at organising investigation and research were infiltrated and disrupted by people acting on behalf of noted “New Ufologists”.  There was an attempt to stage a Men-In-Black style silencing operation against myself badly back-fired. Not once but twice and on the second occasion those involved were somewhat cowered when they found themselves surrounded by police officers who were visiting my home and had heard the threats and used a rear door to position themselves behind the ‘MIB’.

For this reason any report featuring the names of certain people are often given the lowest classification possible since they make it impossible to contact alleged witnesses to confirm details.  Certain alleged percipients no trace could be found of leading to the suspicion that even they were fictional. As people pointed out there seemed to be no logical sense in denying access to witnesses in these cases when it came to someone specialising in the subject and who never breached confidentiality (since 1973 some names have never been revealed in reports I looked into). Why would “New Ufologists” be afraid to have their reports authenticated?

One thing that is very noticeable is how cases that could be put down to “psychological” explanations were promoted heavily. Just what type of “psychological effect” was involved did not seem to matter if a few mumbo-jumbo phrases were used. Or the “paranormal connection” was brought in and the amount some reports dedicated to “I heard an unexplained bump noise” or “something fell in the kitchen” is ludicrous.

Reports featured far more speculation about “paranormal activity” and the investigators’ own theories than what they should have contained: factual recording and reporting of the facts in a report and assessment of the observer”.

The amount of time and space dedicated to the alleged encounters of Joyce Bowles (who was either hoaxing or a “Ruth Syndrome” case) and Ted Pratt (who tended to let Mrs Bowles do all the talking) was terrible. But it kept Ufologists arguing and at odds with each other and this might have been the whole point.

As someone from the Ministry of Defence once put it –and I paraphrase here: “Why would the Ministry try to silence Ufology –it’ doing a far better job by itself than we ever could!”

Old reports untainted by “New Ufology” really ought to be looked at and John Hanson from the Haunted Skies Project has done this to a certain extent and even found some cases not previously recorded or investigated. Unless witnesses/percipients can be spoken to first hand and details confirmed then the lowest ratings are applied.

I have bulky UK files and I know a quarter of the reports have to be considered fake.

There is your explanation.

But what can be done to correct the situation? Firstly, all those suspected or known to have faked reports need to be named openly. Sadly, I cannot see this happen in Ufology because too many people have too much in the way of vested interests.

Secondly, there needs to be a full disclosure of every report which was faked.

Thirdly, there needs to be a legitimate reason given as to why these reports were faked.

There is the cowardice of not admitting to what was done because it would be quite shameful and if the Ufologists involved are not ashamed then I think that shows a greater character problem.

Openly admitting to faking reports means that debunkers then have enough ammunition to slap down most reports in Ufology and remember: that would be BACAUSE of Ufologists and no one else.

Another problem is that any genuine report coming from those individuals could never be taken as serious or trusted.

From 1975 up until a year before his death, I had regularly correspondence and phone call exchanging with Eric Morris (who had a number of UFO ‘groups’ and publications). By 1983 I was aware that things he was telling me were untrue. Incidents and reports that I double checked never panned out and as soon as the whole “Grey” abduction phenomenon broke he was straight in it; symbols noted during abductions by witnesses, ‘fully documented’ mass UFO abduction of 20+ people and even a report in which people in two cars observed a UFO crash into a roadside wall and the impact was felt throughout the nearest village. As it happened I knew a naturalist who lived in the village Morris mentioned and he had been out observing owls at a point right next to where the wall had been demolished. In fact, he had been out every night the entire week and he doubted that he was concentrating so much on the owls that he missed a 20 feet diameter UFO crash into a wall!

Morris faked (badly) documents and on one occasion his rubber stamp was on the reverse side. The “Black Heath UFO crash” was his work. He threatened people as part of his ‘problem’. The late Joan Amos, widely known in UFO and Fortean circles, was in her 70s when Morris threatened her physically to get some documents she had. When a male neighbour heard all of this and went out to intervene in the matter Morris left.

Over the telephone he once threatened to shoot me and told me that there would be no consequences for him as he was still employed by the secret service (apparently he had operated some communications system in Romania in the late 1970s). Well, that was the last straw for me and I contacted Cheshire police and reported the phone call. Morris denied it all while “saying some odd things” and I was told that he did not have a good reputation and I should try to avoid further contact with him.

His faking of reports and witness bullying was known to top UK Ufologists –some of whom had not only been threatened by him but also used similar tactics.

I then read that he had been applauded over a talk (which was all fake material and info) at a Northern UFO event. I never believed that because others prominently involved all knew about Morris. However, two different Ufologists told me that it was all true and that even those in conflict with Morris had applauded and spoke highly of him.

That is what I like to term a “WTF?” incident.

I have one full case report which was submitted to the MoD since Morris had, it seems, used my name several times. The report from Morris contained letters to various RAF commands, local authorities and the claims were so paranoid and delusional that I asked someone I knew who was a psychologist to read through it for me. “Paranoid. Delusional and with possible psychopathic traits” was the character assessment I got back.

All of this was known to leading Ufologists and Ufology in general. Nothing happened –because anyone can become a Ufologist and there are no rules or official guidelines.

Morris later told others that Budd Hopkins had told him that he had never heard of me –well, I have an annotated and signed copy of one of his books plus correspondence. I asked Budd who was confused…”Who is Eric Morris?”

Followiong the ManchesterAirport sighting in the 1990s Morris sent me a taped interview with an alleged witness. Morris is constantly calling the object a “space craft” and adding details not given by the witness (if a real witness). I was asked to filter this through to the MoD…I have no idea why although he had told me that he had sent full reports on prominent Ufologists to the MoD and offered to work with them (MoD) to infiltrate British Ufology…even though he had been in Ufology since the 1970s. Needless-to-say, I never passed anything to the MoD on his behalf.

We have prominent European Ufologist hoaxing other Ufologists, American Ufologists doing likewise and (knowing the info they have is fake) those Ufologists still using the information in talks, books and articles.

I am not even going to delve in the number of scandals that have hit the US organisation MUFON. I have absolutely nothing good to say about its “GB” branch.

Recently, I decided to carry out a survey of UK UFO groups. Standard survey and surveys are carried out every day all around the world. These are the series of questions I sent out (each made individual by putting the name of the group on the form) in this case sent to the British UFO Research Association (BUFORA):

 

1.      How members does BUFORA currently have and has the number     increased or decreased over recent years?

 

     2.   How many field investigators does BUFORA currently have and is  

           any

           training given or is an investigators manual provided?

 

3.     What current or past UFO research studies has BUFORA conducted  and into what aspects of UFOs?

 

4.     Re. above: have there been any proven results from this research?

 

5.     Re. UFO sightings approximately how many reports were received in 2019?

 

6.     How many of the 2019 reports have been identified or classed as Unknown?

 

7.     How many UFO sighting reports have been received so far in 2020?

 

8.     Have any conclusions been drawn on some of these reports (based on the current restrictions) ?

 

9.     What is BUFORAs current stance regarding the possible origin(s) of the UFO phenomena?

 

10.  What are BUFORAs future plans for research?

 

These are all basic questions but combined with responses from others would give a good overall picture of British Ufology. On the 5th December, 2020, I received the BUFORA response:

 

Dear Terry

Thank you for your email.

We are very busy as a voluntary organisation.  We are not a membership

based organisation and have not been for many years now.

I would be happy to talk with you in Jaunary rather than answer your

questions below.  The UFO subject is very complex so realy some of the

questions are not quite relevant.

We have a lot of information on our website, so this may help you too.

  I have an article for 2028 and  2019 generally looking at statistics

and sightings during last year.  We do run an investigator's course,

which is in six modules and an examination and takes about 8 months to

complete. This course focuses upon what can be observed and

MISIDENTIED in the sky.  It is the case that up to 98% of all sighting

reports have a rational explanation when reported quickly and with

accurate information.

The most crucial factor in this subject is the 'human face' of

ufology, our beliefs, our perception and our memory and how these

reflect upon how a sighting or experiences is reported.  70% plus of

all sighting reports are now images and have been for many years.

 

If you would like to call, let me know and I will send my telephone number.

 

Sincerely

Heather

 

Gloria Heather Dixon

BUFORA National Investigations

 

Remember that this was from the head of national investigations. She has statistics for “2028”?  And “&0% of all sighting reports are now images” I take it this means photographs and video.  All the typographical errors are as they appear in the email. I looked the email over several times and then the questionnaire and all of the questions should be easily answered.

A survey cannot be carried out with a quick phone chat as the material making up the survey has to be available in case questions are raised. I pointed this out but have received no response.

There is an investigation course and I looked this up on the official BUFORA web page and noted this immediately:

“The fee is £49.95 and if you decide to enrol on the course, please contact us at enquiries@bufora,org.uk to obtain payment details. The course fee is non-refundable under any circumstances

Unrefundable under any circumstance which means that if you sign up the course could be cancelled be utter rubbish but you gave away your money so Yah! Boo! Sucks!  I then remembered that BUFORA had gotten rid of its much publicised ”Limited company” status under which terms the above non refundable fee would not be allowed.

I was surprised that nothing listed on the BUFORA page had changed since the early 1990s (BUFORA having fully backed the Santilli hoax Roswell autopsy video). The organisation seems more set up to make money these days and their press section notes:

“BUFORA charge a fee of £200.00 plus expenses for speakers at any conference or event.”

I have, obviously, been in contact with some BUFORA investigators over the last few years and, honestly, they have not been impressive.  There is the usual (standard) “experiencer” group (no mention of a fee there) but to be honest the web page does not give a good impression to anyone other than someone not versed in the subject. In fact, BUFORA comes across as jumping onto the debunking side of the fence.

As for other groups they have not responded either. It seems almost as though everyone is scared of committing themselves so “something” by answering a few basic questions –in the 1970s and 1970s there was generally an 80-90% response to surveys since they also publicised the groups.

I wonder whether this is why so many people involved in Ufology set up their own teams or just work in pairs ?

I had hoped that a survey might show a glimmer of hope but it appears as though the UK decided on the lazy route and that making a few quid was better than getting boots dirtied and, above all else, you break away from the new norm and you will get “the treatment”.

This just seems to be how it is and, perhaps, I am being silly expecting Ufology to serious investigate and research UFOs?