Total Pageviews

Sunday, 27 June 2021

Preliminary Thoughts about the Preliminary Assessment on UAPs RELEASED T...

A Few words

 I  do understand that I can be VERY annoying to people. When it comes to general "mysteries" I got into that as a kid. UFOs and the paranormal I got into in 1974. It is very hard to explain to someone WHY I believe something is a hoax or state outrightly that it is based on decades of research work.

With Grey Book and the AOP Bureau both Lord (Brinsley) Clancarty and Sir Victor Goddard stated that it would be the closest thing to Project Blue Book the UK would get -remember that Goddard was in on the flying saucer phenomena from the outset and even spoke to Presient Truman to prevent certain actions and every Director of RAF Intell after him had, at some point served under him or worked with him later and it was inconceivable that they would lie to him because he had other informal sources.
When the edited UFO Report was offered to the main UFO groups -and "researchers" - in 1984 it was rejected,. BUFORA, Contact (UK), UFOIN all said "no". Why? Because it kicked a lot of ufological fakery and misreporting up the ass and showed how ufologists had knowingly lied and deceived simply to "keep the subject going".
The solutions offered in The Report were not debunking. In fact you have to read the report to know why the evidence pointed to two phenomena being involved.
In 1982 I had to compile the bulky "Intelligence Report" which looked at the Armed Forces and Intelligence agencies around the world and their involvement with UFOs. If you read that you wou;ld know why the recent US 'disclosures' are nothing new -they go back to the 1940s.
The constant fakery, lack of investigation and accepting every light in the sky as "aliens" is why I totally withdrew from having anything to do with Ufologists and groups.
Where were all of the "Highly detailed and investigated" sightings of close proximity seemingly constructed alien craft? I decided long ago that if there WERE alien space craft of some type then there had to be aliens, right? So from the 1970s on I concentrated on CE3K/Alien Entity reports -which led on to the three books.
I applied even more scrutiny than I did in my "creature" work which clearly identified mystery creatures in France as hyena. Which showed that the Barking Beast of Bath was an escaped chimpanzee. That there were gorillas brought to the UK as early as 1801. That the Girt Dog of Ennerdale was a large dog NOT a hyena, a tiger, a thylacine or anything else the cryptozoologists want to still call it.
Do you know how I managed all of this including the findings in The Red Paper -finding 'lost' photographs and sources and more? I did what 99% of the 'experts' don't. I did research. I found those actually not lost photographs and sources and I talked to experts in different fields.
My books are all fully referenced and that means that everything I write can be double checked.
Despite all of this there ARE still mysteries that need solving and I highlight those, if you want to believe every money earning bunko person on TV who add to stories or still tell you that solved cases are unexplained mysteries still...or every You tuber who has studied all the inaccurate web sites to bring you 'facts' -that is up to you.
But if you have a free thinking mind and want to know the truth......