Last night the wildlife and cats returned. Nothing unusual was picked up by either of my cameras.
There was no interest shownon the AOP Face Book group and none here, therefore I have decided that anything recorded in the future will be part of a private project.
The lack of interest is astounding at times.
Based on my promise of strict anonimity a person who was very active in "New Ufology" in the late 1970s/1980s in the UK offered up some information -all checkable by me.
Firstly, he name ufologists who were involved in the APEN (Aerial Phenomena Enquiry Network) hoaxing (google it). There were no surprises as all but one was already known to me and in a file held by my solicitors in case it was ever needed.
Secondly, something that I suspected fort a long time. Reports by Northern UK based ufologists were often made up or twisted and added to UFO sighting reports. Also, some of those involved in UFO investigations were "unstable at best" and added a lot of imagined incidents or incidents that could be easily explained to their reports.
The sad thing about all of this is that I do not care. I found out things over 30 years or more ago and adjusted files and so on back then. I have examples of documents faked by certain ufologists and much more.
My research is based on research that means double, triple and quadruple checking of sources and not relying on something from the internet. I was not, as I explained beforwe, surprised when I was told that reports from "black" observers tended to be disregarded. Nor was I surprised that observer(s) reporting UFOs on more than one occasion were listed as "cranks".
Ufology never really had any scientific approach in the UK. The same can be said of the USA despite attempts made there.
Euporia 1973 -multiple witnesses (two groups) of a low level and one landed object on a US highway. Disregarded because the witnesses were "black".
