Total Pageviews

Friday, 2 September 2022

BTS RAW #10 - Deepening UAP Secrecy & ? A Few Notes


John Greenwald's summation at the end of his video is spot on. As I noted in my last post from the very outset of this AATIP, AAWSAP, Elizondo farce the one thing that was strikingly obvious is that the UFO community (it isn't really but we'll call it that for the sake of argument) to "UFO believers" have been gas-lighted and slowly told what they wanted to hear.
Above: Captain Edward J. Ruppelt former head of USAF Project Blue Book who coined the term "UFO"

From the outset Elizondo and his counter intelligence people have led the narrative: the press and media and those wanting to jump on that particular bandwagon have started to use the term "UAP" and they have to explain to everyone that "its an official term for UFO -same thing". Incorrect. The person who officially coined the term UFO was the then head of USAF Project Blue Book Captain Edward J. Ruppelt. In fact "UFOB" was also used in typical military style -Unidentified Flying OBject. It is a term a lot of us used since the 1970s (UFOB) to denote a report of what is obviously a constructed object rather than just a vague light. In fact, during the late 1970s and early 1980s we tried using the term UAP within Ufology and do you know what? After a few years we had to go back to UFO as having to explain constantly that UAP was the same as UFO was getting monotonous. The USAF never used the term UAP and it seems to have been selected as a project hook word.

All the UFO groups wanting to be hip and cool are now using the term UAP and advising (telling) its people to use the acronym as it is "relevant". And that in itself is causing arguments and confusion amongst Ufologists -I heard from one that he was told to change the UFO term used in a report to UAP and re-submit. Slam-dunk for the "Elizondo Camp".

All the usual media hucksters in Ufology have now started dropping the term UAP into their UFO lies, twisting of facts and using solved incidents as "still a mystery" disinformation. Those Ufologists are the saps helping to promote this deceit.

The "UFO believers" are accepting the words of those who have deceived them for decades by lying about UFOs and ridiculing witnesses because they are claiming to be "UFO whistle-blowers" and Elizondo is not a very good actor and watching his performances they are well scripted but the key "hook" words are delivered badly and why people do not realise he is gaslighting is not surprising...except it is to be expected because they are told what they want to hear even if there is absolutely no facts to back up what they are being told.

When I wrote that I did not believe Elizondo and gave a breakdown as to why I got some very personal attacks from UFO believers -not counter arguments which are ALWAYS welcome but insults and not one of these people knew me or anything about my work. Elizondo has his pets well trained and ready to go for anyone who even doubts his word. His behaviour is of someone who knows the long play con is reliant on people believing.

Why should Greenwald be the subject of some vicious trolling, at the seeming instigation of Elizondo when all he is doing -and providing the documentation to prove it (which Elizondo has never done)- is trying to sort out an AATIP/AAWSAP (think about that last acronym) timeline and find out more about the people involved?  UFO believers should be encouraging him to dig deeper and get more facts but instead he has become (in their eyes thanks to expert guidance) "the huckster", "the con man" and worse. 

1. Establish the base story
2. Drop in key "hooks"
3. Add claims while stating "this cannot be proven because of---"
4.Set yourself up as a man fighting the establishment
5.  Once the mob is hooked lead the narrative and turn the mob against those who might point out problems in the story.
6. Create discontent and establish a chaotic situation of doubt and inter-group/personality rivalry.

Sound familiar?   I will NOT use the term UAP and, being honest here, I long ago left the silly lights-in-the-sky subject for specialisation and sitting on the outside I can see this all playing out because I am not just going to bloggers oir people with You Tube channels who preach what I want to hear. 

Read my previous post. UFO believers and Ufology opened up the doors and closed them behind the men who are out to spread chaos and deceit. There is no "UFO disclosure" coming (again) because the subject -as I stated a couple months back- has now been classified by the very people hailed as heroes for saying they want the truth out there.

There is nothing new here and all that is going to happen is that we will hear far less about official UFO reports. Remember the names of all the people involved in this from the start and start joining the dots.  Skinwalker Ranch may well be a part of the plan -again:look at all of the names and ASK QUESTIONS!

Bigfoot: Best Evidence

When referring to Roosevelt and the "Bigfoot" story read this account:

The Debunkers are Now The Heroes...HOW Did That Happen?

 


Gas lighting is going on.

Just look at the indepth and intense amount of work put in by John Greenwald Jnr of The Black Vault on a Luis Elizondo, "The Pentagon UFO Project", the AATIP, AAWSAP and contradictory dates and stories.



Look at Steven Greenstreet's work on the same subject: all fully referenced and all pointing to some very suspect goings on.



Millions of dollars ($22m) were given to Senator Harry Read's friend and financial supporter Robert Bigelow. A tender for carrying out the research work should have been open but only Bigelow's BAAS was involved. Watch the videos.

Out of the blue a UFO whistle blower named Elizondo told the world there was a secret UFO project and that he was in charge of it. Except he wasn't. It's like Nick Pope claiming to have been THE Ministry of Defence UFO investigator when he was simply a desk man but Elizondo claimed his budget was in the millions. Except it was not. Who is backing him up? Other persons involved in or formerly involved in intelligence.  

Out of the blue we are seeing secret UFO photos released that look like balloons and so on. Nothing there to make us shout out "WOW!" Those photos should not have been released say the people who released them and we more or less know that these are now IFOs (Identified Flying Objects).

Again -whistle blowers in the "Nimitz encounters".  A lot of whistle blowing but no solid evidence. A show Senate hearing where nothing is released other than what was known before. 

Someone drops the term "Tic-Tac" UFO and now every UFO being reported is a "Tic-Tac". All the media is talking and writing about "Tic-Tac" UFOs. Organisations like MUFON are now focussing on the crowd pulling good press stories "Tic-Tac" UFOs being reported -just like they pushed grey abduction reports when it was hot while kicking out anything that was not a claimed Grey abduction. They promoted the frauds who pushed back work in Ufology 30 years.

Orbs then became hot and reports were even changed to make UFOs "orbs" -remember how "Rods" were also pulled into Ufology. If it sells to the media and pulls in paying members or  gets people buying tickets for lectures it is the "only" thing going.

We are seeing this in the way that reporters are being fed the line "they are UAP not UFOs" and so TV shows and bloggers and others are all jumping on the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena band wagon. We were using UAP in the 1980s but dropped it because people had to be told "UAPs are UFOs". Using UAP as a term the media is being led into a new direction -its a term that is the "hook" and it goes on from there.

USOs -Unidentified Submarine Objects (reports of which I investigated in the 1970s and 1980s) were nothing. Even the less than factual TV show UFO Hunters failed to enliven the subject. But with the "Tic-Tac" videos we have have a new angle -"trans-medium" or as we have called it since the 1950s " a UFO flying through the air and entering the sea". There  is nothing new with objects entering or leaving the seas and oceans but suddenly "USO" is the new hook and we have videos and TV shows talking about USOs - "if a USO is seen then locally there is an alien abduction taking place".

People in the media and Ufology are being given the "we are not saying this is correct/this is connected" but given a heavy 'hint' to follow that 'lead'.

The "mass Tic-Tac sightings are drones"...up to 50-100 sighted over a short period so a mass UFO UAP event. Last year I posted a military news convention item about how "mass drone flights" as well as mass mini ("micro") drone fleets can be deployed. What a coincidence. And after lying for decades about no UFO study and ridiculing the public about UFO reports we now have the debunkers being hailed as hero truth seekers while the truth seekers with decades of work to their credit (and all fully documented) are the "debunkers" who are viciously trolled online!

Just ask HOW that happened.

The UFO "believers" are fed the line they WANT to hear and will not accept anything going against that.  From the first time I saw Elizondo the one thing that came into my head was "This fella is gas-lighting". I posted that I did not believe his account and...the really nasty Twitter responses was quite funny and all personally aimed at me (from people who did not know me and I never knew them).

Ufology is being guided by people who really should NOT be leading the narrative and some (Elizondo) are "doing a Trump" by having their "followers" attack people online who just disagree with a claim they made. These people (no such thing as "ex Intelligence man") are leading the narrative and that's it.

Read and listen to the evidence not the smoke and mirrors.

7News - Ross Coulthart - UAP / UFO - Full documentary - Aug 21 2022