I Remember When UFO Investiigators Were NOT DRONES!

 

 Apparently if you belong to MUFON you cannot investigate nnything unless "mummy and daddy say so". I contacted  SW MUFON UFO UAP Investigation and told them about the Eupora case. It would be aq cold case and this is what I got in response:

Well, MUFON are not interested and got nasty to get out of doing anything and so it seems the SW MuFON people are just not intertested as well. They are NOT allowed to inbvestigate any case unless their MUFON bosses say so.

Their response re Euporia:

You would have to file a report with MUFON using this link [https://mufon.com/experiencer-resource-team-ert/](https://mufon.com/experiencer-resource-team-ert/...)

[](https://mufon.com/experiencer-resource-team-ert/...)

Experiencer Resource Team (Ert)

mufon.com

We can only investigate officially submitted MUFON cases but we have many folks who would love to help you out if you submit the report - regardless of if you do or don't have evidence and we can only investigate cases submitted by the actual witnesses you can't submit someone else's sighting or contact if must be what you saw does this make sense?

Yes it makes sense. MUFON is a shambles of an organisation and its investigators appear to have been turned into mindless drones.

I have run out of options in the US/Mississippi so it lo0oks like the full details of what happened in 1973 are lost. I have contacted local news papers, radio and am not hopeful.

All because of initial racial prejudice

That written I was polite in my response:

Yes, I understand but this is potentially a major old UFO incident for which we know the names of some of the witnesses and those are the people that I have tried to trace. I was not there but the case is on the record from the time and was, admittedly, ignore because the witnesses were black. I just cannot understand the lack of willingness to look into an old case but willingness to ignore and lose the data. Thanks anyway.

UFO Investigators in Mississippi

 Does anyone know of any UFO investigators in  the Eupora, Webster county, Missouri or in the state itself and are independent of MUFON and can look into cases without having to wait for someone to approve it?

The Eup0ora multi witness sighting of 1973 was ignored by local investigators despite Hynek and Ted Bloecher requesting the case be looked into because the witnesses were black. It could be a potentially very imp-ortant Close Encounter of the Third Kind butthe witnesses are not getting any younger and we need to get their accounts before they are lost forever.

Contact me at 

hoopert1957@gmail.com

I am posting this around.....

 

I am posting this around as I am somewhat unhappy at the revenue I am losing from books.]

I use a US based print on demand company (UK is so backward it does not have PODs) and they get a cut of a sale for simply storing a PDF. The printers get their money, rightly. And any sales money is low BUT I can get taxed by the IRS and the POD only pays me when the exchange rate is in its ($) favour.,

I have lost money on my CE3K books. I saw each one appear and US next to it but my percentage 0000. This has happened before and the POD always sends you in circles with silly excuses.

I know someone in the US who has helped out with non payment and other issues with UIS companies re my other work. He's ex-IRS and I've done him a few favours so I asked if he could look into these printed books for which I get nothing?

Today he got back to me. "The "US" on the data sheet you see is not for a US sale as such. It means that the copies were requested by the US Government. I checked and have found that your books -total four sets of all the books since 2024- were delivered to the United States Department of Defense (pre title change). That means a total block on finding out who exactly ordered them. Sorry"

I say no more.

Done

  I am all spent.  Thousands of views but no book sales. No feed back.  Perhaps joining the UFO grifters would have been best.

Enjoy what is on site.

There will NEVER be "Disclosure"

 There will NEVER be "Disclosure" and I have been saying that since 1997 when some of the first grifters announced "UFO Disclosure is next year",

Back in the early 1980s I used to meet up with an American gentleman I had corresponded with on UFOs since the 1970s. I knew what his work was supposed to be but I also knew who he worked for (that is a semi funny story in itself).

We would meet and exchange UFO reports and items of interest and he would have a short list of any questions such as "Have you come across-----" or "We've found this feature in some reports -have you and any idea what it might mean?" and so on.

I had similar conversations with persons attached to the UK MoD and the one thing I learnt was that official bodies had UFO reports, they had photos etc but they were no nearer to having anything solid than UFO groups.

There are no frozen bodies and certainly not, at my last count, well over 100 crashed alien space craft -just think that through logically Travel through interstellar space with such poor technology that every flight is a suicide mission OVER 80 years -no advancement.

I was unofficially at a certain US base in the 1980s looking into a UFO report. Nothing "Top Secret" though the visit was later distorted out of reality on the TV series UFO Hunters.

So if you think any government is going to shatter everyone's world view and release sensational cases that cannot be explained...think again.

Photo of a Ghost?

 Here is the photo and the story:

In 1982, photographer Chris Brackley unknowingly captured what would go on to become one of the most talked-about ghost photographs ever taken, all within the quiet, historic walls of St Botolph’s Church. At the time, nothing seemed out of the ordinary. The church stood still and silent, steeped in centuries of history, its dim lighting and towering architecture creating an atmosphere that already felt heavy with the past. Chris simply set up his camera and took the shot, unaware that anything unusual had entered his frame.

But when the film was later developed, everything changed. As the image slowly came into focus, Chris noticed something he couldn’t explain. High up in the church loft, tucked into the upper right-hand corner of the photograph, was a faint and almost transparent figure. It appeared to be a woman, dressed in old-fashioned clothing that didn’t belong to the modern world. Her form was subtle yet unmistakable, as if she had been quietly standing there, watching from above the entire time.

Shaken by the discovery, the photograph was examined closely by experts. They analyzed the negative, searching for any logical explanation—double exposure, camera malfunction, or flaws in the film. But nothing turned up. The negative was clean, the equipment had been functioning perfectly, and there were no signs of tampering or error. With every possibility ruled out, the image only became more unsettling. To many, it suggested something far harder to explain—a presence that had been there, unseen, at the exact moment the photo was taken.

The story might have ended there, remaining just another unexplained mystery, but years later, an even stranger connection surfaced. Chris was contacted by a builder who had been working on restoration efforts within the church’s crypt. During the process, the builder accidentally broke through part of an old wall, uncovering a hidden stack of ancient coffins that had long been sealed away from sight. As one of the coffins shifted and opened, it revealed a body that was shockingly well-preserved despite the passage of time.

What truly sent chills down his spine, however, was the face. The features of the body bore an uncanny resemblance to the figure captured in Chris’s photograph years before. The same structure, the same presence—it was as if the woman in the loft had been silently connected to the remains hidden beneath the church all along.

Since then, the photograph has continued to circulate, sparking debate between skeptics and believers alike. Some insist there must be a rational explanation still waiting to be discovered, while others see it as undeniable evidence that certain places hold onto the echoes of those who once walked them. And in the quiet halls of St Botolph’s Church, many wonder if that figure in the loft was never truly alone… or if she’s still there, watching from above.

----------------

What do I think?

Superimposed? Look how very sharp everything is except for the column on thje figure's sid and the figuire/background. Two separate images.

The Kinderhook Creature: In The Shadow of Sasquatch (New Full Bigfoot Documentary)