Total Pageviews

Monday, 2 November 2015

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

A lot of us have said for a long time that Antarctic ice sheets probably do decline then increase but now NASA says it.

http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

Antarctic Peninsula
A new NASA study says that Antarctica is overall accumulating ice. Still, areas of the continent, like the Antarctic Peninsula photographed above, have increased their mass loss in the last decades.
 
 
Credits: NASA's Operation IceBridge
Map showing the rates of mass changes from ICESat 2003-2008 over Antarctica.
Map showing the rates of mass changes from ICESat 2003-2008 over Antarctica. Sums are for all of Antarctica: East Antarctica (EA, 2-17); interior West Antarctica (WA2, 1, 18, 19, and 23); coastal West Antarctica (WA1, 20-21); and the Antarctic Peninsula (24-27). A gigaton (Gt) corresponds to a billion metric tons, or 1.1 billion U.S. tons.
Credits: Jay Zwally/ Journal of Glaciology
 
 
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.


According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed   to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.


“We’re essentially in agreement with other studies that show an increase in ice discharge in the Antarctic Peninsula and the Thwaites and Pine Island region of West Antarctica,” said Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author of the study, which was published on Oct. 30 in the Journal of Glaciology. “Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica – there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.”  Zwally added that his team “measured small height changes over large areas, as well as the large changes observed over smaller areas.”


Scientists calculate how much the ice sheet is growing or shrinking from the changes in surface height that are measured by the satellite altimeters. In locations where the amount of new snowfall accumulating on an ice sheet is not equal to the ice flow downward and outward to the ocean, the surface height changes and the ice-sheet mass grows or shrinks.


But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
The study analyzed changes in the surface height of the Antarctic ice sheet measured by radar altimeters on two European Space Agency European Remote Sensing (ERS) satellites, spanning from 1992 to 2001, and by the laser altimeter on NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) from 2003 to 2008.


Zwally said that while other scientists have assumed that the gains in elevation seen in East Antarctica are due to recent increases in snow accumulation, his team used meteorological data beginning in 1979 to show that the snowfall in East Antarctica actually decreased by 11 billion tons per year during both the ERS and ICESat periods. They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time.


“At the end of the last Ice Age, the air became warmer and carried more moisture across the continent, doubling the amount of snow dropped on the ice sheet,” Zwally said.


The extra snowfall that began 10,000 years ago has been slowly accumulating on the ice sheet and compacting into solid ice over millennia, thickening the ice in East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica by an average of 0.7 inches (1.7 centimeters) per year. This small thickening, sustained over thousands of years and spread over the vast expanse of these sectors of Antarctica, corresponds to a very large gain of ice – enough to outweigh the losses from fast-flowing glaciers in other parts of the continent and reduce global sea level rise. 


Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year.


“The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some other contribution to sea level rise that is not accounted for.”


“The new study highlights the difficulties of measuring the small changes in ice height happening in East Antarctica,” said Ben Smith, a glaciologist with the University of Washington in Seattle who was not involved in Zwally’s study.


"Doing altimetry accurately for very large areas is extraordinarily difficult, and there are measurements of snow accumulation that need to be done independently to understand what’s happening in these places,” Smith said.


To help accurately measure changes in Antarctica, NASA is developing the successor to the ICESat mission, ICESat-2, which is scheduled to launch in 2018. “ICESat-2 will measure changes in the ice sheet within the thickness of a No. 2 pencil,” said Tom Neumann, a glaciologist at Goddard and deputy project scientist for ICESat-2. “It will contribute to solving the problem of Antarctica’s mass balance by providing a long-term record of elevation changes.”

Butterfly UFO Filmed

Oh dear.  Well, I am not a scientist but.......no. Story first.
Best UFO Footage Ever?

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/2528473/incredible-butterfly-tr3b-type-alien-ufo-caught-on-video-by-father-and-son-is-the-best-ufo-evidence-ever/#etVLSe9dwaJhUd2p.99



A father and son pair has reportedly captured stunning footage showing a TR3B-type triangle UFO with a bizarre butterfly shape flying in the sky near the Ohio-Kentucky border.

According to the YouTube UFO hunters Secureteam10, who uploaded the footage to YouTube on October 26, 2015, the aerodynamic, triangle-shaped alien UFO was captured on Saturday, October 24 by a father and son pair –identified as Tom (dad) and Christopher (son) — as they were leaving a restaurant in an undisclosed location near the border of Ohio and Kentucky at about 7 p.m. (local time).
The pair was also able to snap stunningly clear photographs of the triangle TR3B-Type UFO that have sent enthusiasts into a tizzy.


Express draws attention to the “butterfly” shape of the black UFO spotting bright lights on its underbelly. The strange craft moves slowly across the sky in eerie silence like a stealth reconnaissance craft.

Rows of windows and chambers with glowing lights can be seen along the body of the UFO, and it exhibits clearly otherworldly characteristics, according to the witnesses.

Express writes that Tyler Glockner, who runs the Securteam10 YouTube channel, said, “The father and son both described the craft as eerily silent. There are rows of windows, chambers, glowing lights and other characteristics that simply don’t jive with anything you can imagine on Earth. If you can look at this and convince yourself, hey it’s just one of ours… aliens are not visiting us, well whatever it takes for you to sleep at night. This is simply amazing footage, one more piece to the puzzle; I can lay my head knowing we have not been alone for some time.”

Are alien scouts checking out our world ahead of an invasion?
According to Tom and Christopher, about five minutes after they filmed the strange alien craft, two military helicopters zoomed across the sky, apparently to investigate the mysterious UFO phenomenon.
The father and son pair reported they were stunned to see the “two military helicopters” as they drove away from the scene of the sighting. But they were unable to snap photos of the helicopters because they appeared unexpectedly and flew out of sight too quickly.


The stunningly clear footage of an alleged UFO has sparked excitement in the online UFO community. The footage has gone viral, with UFO enthusiasts saying it is possibly the clearest alien UFO footage ever caught on camera. Some have even declared that this could be the long-awaited proof of alien UFO activity in the Earth’s atmosphere.
“Wow, best shot of a UFO I have ever seen.”
“I wonder what would happen if this is shown to local news media outlets. Show this to the state governor? State reps? I think maybe sometime soon we should start displaying our videos to them to get them to maybe take some sort of action?”
And according to Secureteam10, the latest find strengthens the belief among members of the UFO community that alien and UFO disclosure by government agencies is imminent.

The Illuminati-controlled governments of the world could not hope to continue hiding the truth indefinitely with damming evidence emerging every day on the alien, UFO, and conspiracy theory blogosphere, enthusiasts argue.

According to conspiracy theorists, the alleged military helicopters could be proof that the government is aware of the activity of alien UFOs in U.S. airspace and that the authorities are concerned about it. But with allegations of military-technological alliance between the U.S. government and technologically advanced alien races, some conspiracy theorists believe that the incident could have been a joint exercise between the U.S. military and alien allies.


While UFO enthusiasts are nearly unanimous that this could be the clinching evidence of alien UFO activity on Earth, skeptical UFO researchers have raised doubts about the authenticity of the footage and photographs by pointing out that Secureteam10 has been known in the past to try to palm off computer generated images (CGI) as authentic UFO footage.
“This is fake, and here are the simple reasons why > – 2 mistakes you made were – 1) the camera shake is unnatural and computer generated! 2) For the size of the object, and slow speed its moving, the object disappears too quickly into the distance – tut, tut, tut, get someone better who knows how to do CGI. I’m a believer myself but this is disgraceful.”
But Express reports that Tyler Glockner, who runs the Secureteam10 YouTube channel, has denied allegations that the footage is CGI.

“The reason I am calling this an alien craft rather than just a UFO is in the stunning detail, where we can see the true structural characteristics of this ship,” Glockner said. “And guys, you take a look and tell me with a straight face this has anything to do with humans. The features on this thing don’t make any sense.”


“And guys you take a look and tell me with a straight face this has anything to do with humans. The features on this thing don’t make any sense.”
Some skeptics pointed out that judging from the shape of the alleged UFO craft it, could a “radio-controlled glider.”
“It seems like a rc glider type of thing I couldn’t see it being a manned craft.”
But a viewer, who claims to be a raido-controlled glider designer, denied the suggestion.
“I design and fly rc planes… this is not one. Any pilot can look at this and tell it isn’t a design made for aeronautics.”
Others insisted that there was no reason to suppose it was not a man-made craft.
 Butterfly UFO Over Ohio-Kentucky Border


“Whilst I have no doubt that life exists elsewhere I would never underestimate the ingenuity of our own aerospace engineers,” a viewer said. “I would also suggest it is foolhardy to assume that western nations have a monopoly on genius and design.”

What do you think? Is this authentic UFO footage or CGI?

So, here is the video of an object that is much closer than claimed to be and some "odd" sections of video footage.  Fake.
 
Sadly.

They Say Ranga-Ram Chary found a mysterious glow -but did he find the multi-verse?

Hmm. Interesting.  But let's not get too excited just yet.


Universe is a hologram


We might just have found evidence of another universe bumping into planet Earth, a scientist has very tentatively suggested. While mapping the cosmic microwave background – the light left over from the early universe – Ranga-Ram Chary found a mysterious glow.

Chary, a researcher at Planck's US data centre in California, was mapping CMB when he spotted the unexpected glow. In his paper, Spectral Variations of the Sky: Constraints on Alternate Universes, he said that while there is a 30% chance the fluctuations are nothing unusual, there is also the possibility they provide evidence of a multiverse.

"It could also possibly be due to the collision of our Universe with an alternate Universe whose baryon to photon ratio is a factor of around 65 larger than ours," he wrote.

The idea of a multiverse is nothing new. It says we are but one of many other universes. It builds on the notion of cosmic inflation and while the idea has gained more recognition over recent decades, being able to prove other universes exist has been unsuccessful.

A report on the discovery in New Scientist notes that our universe colliding with another should be possible according to modern theories about multiverses. The glow, it is suggested, is matter from another universe with different physics to ours.

Chary took everything from the CMB – removing stars, gas and dust – and at the end of this he should have found nothing except noise. But this was not the case. Instead, in a specific frequency, patches of the sky looked brighter than they should have. They appear to have come from just a few hundred thousand years after the big bang – when electrons and protons combined to create light-emitting hydrogen.

However, these spots of light were 4,500 times brighter than they should have been. Jens Chluba, from the University of Cambridge, commented: "This signal is one of the fingerprints of our own universe. Other universes should leave a different mark."

The multiverse explanation says that some protons and electrons might have come into contact with another universe – a collision that made them much brighter. "To explain the signals that Dr Chary found with the cosmological recombination radiation, one needs a large enhancement in the number of [other particles] relative to photons," Chluba says. "In the realm of alternative universes, this is entirely possible."

However, not everyone is convinced. Theoretical astrophysicist David Spergel, from Princeton University, says he thinks it is worth looking into explanations that do not involve other universes. "The dust properties are more complicated than we have been assuming, and I think that this is a more plausible explanation."