Apparently, "BillyBigfoot" wants to argue about the stick he found in woods (see the last post).Firstly, I do NOT enter into correspondence with people using false names. If "BillyBigfoot" wants to discuss anything he needs to identify himself. Otherwise -NO.
Secondly, I think it says a great deal about the fictional UK wild-man hysteria that someone picks up a stick and insists it's a "Bigfoot" stick used for tree-knocking communication. Why? Because it was found in woodland. It's a stick. Does it mean if I find two twigs on the ground they are Bigfoot chopsticks?
There are no UK wild-men nor Bigfoot type hominids. And I am not going to argue because someone who needs a life found a stick and it has become his greatest piece of evidence. A stick is a stick is a stick.
