UFO expert claims he's unearthed brand new evidence to prove 'alien abduction'

That is the title of the You Tube video.  Now I am going to be a pain in the arse.

The points to make are these: firstly, the puncture wounds were known about as they were mentioned by Ted Bloecher in passing during a 1970s UFO event.  In fact, most people who were seriously investigating and studying CE3K/AE cases back then had heard about this and, yes, the Centre for UFO Studies has a big file. In fact, this made a lot of us particularly look out for puncture marks.

To the general public and ufology in general -most of whom did not accept crazy alien encounter stories in any case- it was not widely known if at all.   

The sceptic -the debunkers with no problem at all- will jump in and say "Okay, they had puncture wounds.  That doesn't prove anything!"  Which is correct.  If we knew what these puncture wounds indicated, what procedure they were the result of it would be easier to accept as a form of evidence of "something".

Yes, Dr Hynek and Dr Harder discussed these but, medically, their opinions do not count since one was an astronomer.  James Albert Harder, Ph.D. was a professor of civil and hydraulic engineering at the University of California, Berkeley where he was a professor emeritus.  He was not a doctor of medicine.  That written it does at least prove that there were puncture marks.

But it cannot be called brand new evidence since the record dates back to 1973.

I fully discussed the Pascagoula case in UFO Contact? and if you are that interested in what I believe -buy the book!

One small aspect of a 40 plus year old case report is interesting for people just getting into the subject or wanting to find out more.  However, this goes to show the biggest problem we have.

Research and investigation is at an all time low because everyone just stopped after the false Grey Abduction Syndrome debacle.  Why bother when Hopkins et al told us what was going on?

The Mantell case -explained at the time- as well as that of the Hills, Travis Walton and a few others are seen as "the classics" and are churned out ad nauseum. Other older cases are ignored because ufologists know where the money and publicity is.

Even the classics get misreported.  No surprise there.

But if someone had a CE3K and it is not involving a "Grey" or abductions throughout life what do they think?  It must have been an hallucination because 'millions' have been abducted by Greys so they;ll keep quiet?  This is the legacy ufology itself has created by ignoring everything but "the agenda" that makes them money or keeps them in the media spotlight.

I feel very sad for Mona Stafford, the survivor of the trio abducted in Liberty, Kentucky. After decades she is still in the dark about what it all means -the trio were exposed by ufologists, used and then tossed aside. Stafford, like others who have had similar experiences, should never be just ignored or forgotten.  They need counselling or at least someone they can contact when the memories eat at them as most genuinely suffer post traumatic stress disorder.

Learn everything you can about these cases but keep in mind that "if" these events are happening to people then they need support rather than ridicule from people scared of the thought that ET may be visiting.  

Pascagouls is still a fascinating case.