The Internet Is Losing Its Mind Over Alleged Sightings Of The Legendary Goatman!
Seriously, people, get a grip. Mountain Monsters and a lot of American TV shows have a great deal to answer for. There is a bit more at Uproxx.
Here's Ricci's piece:
This year-old video, which hails from the the Strange Mysteries Channel
on YouTube, details the history of the fabled Goatman. This hybrid
creature has peppered popular culture since 1957 when it was first
spotted in Maryland. I guess we could call this fella a cryptid, as he
is presumably half-human and half-goat, but the video’s lead-in photo
plays like a jokester who likes to hit the gym and enjoys fooling folks
with goat-themed cosplay.
Regardless, the creature known colloquially as “The Pope Lick Monster” has recently (and allegedly) been spotted throughout Wisconsin, Texas, and Kentucky.
That’s quite a stretch for a creature who would presumably be limited
in gait as “a horned man with the cloven hooves of an ungulate.” His
legends hold that he also possesses the strength to tear hikers apart
with ease. Perhaps Goatman also moves with the ungodly speed of Looney
Tunes’ Tasmanian Devil? Stranger things have happened.
These scattered sightings of the creature arrive not too long after the release of J. Nathan Couch’s book, Goatman: Flesh or Folklore?
Couch, a Wisconsin-based ghost hunter, dug into the decades-deep
history of the Goatman, who has frightened generations of teenagers who
would otherwise hang freely in the woods for rampant makeout sessions.
Well, maybe the Goatman did serve a purpose.
Still, what is this mysterious Goatman? He’s certainly not the guy
who dressed up as a goat and lived among his imagined brethren in the
Wasatch Mountains near Ogden, Utah. They found that dude in 2012, and
his story trekked all over the mainstream news.
Well, I have had to take a chance. I have searched the Magonia website and their list of books and I have trawled through every one of my books of folk-lore and so on. No "MacGregor" book from 1955.
The 1930 Tomintoul case seemed to have dead ends everywhere. I even searched through my huge stack of magazines and newsletters from the 1950s-1970. Nothing,
An internet search...nothing. But I was able to search a large internet archive reserved for researchers, or people with nothing better to do...only the 1937 The Peat -Fire Flame by Alasdair Alpin MacGregor, is listed and I already have a first edition copy of that.
There are a few books by A. A. MacGregor -none listed by Magonia. Only one was published in 1955 and that was The Ghost Book: Strange Hauntings in Britainby Alasdair Alpin MacGregor. Is this the reference to the report?
Well, it better be because I just purchased a copy from a contact -and I won't get my money back if it is not.
The whole point in citing references to a report is that it must be accessible to researchers to double check the details. As I have found IntCat lacking in accuracy in places I was NOT going to take what it read without double checking.
Ufologist on site after cite quotes this 1930 incident and 99% of them quote Jerome Clarks UFO Encyclopaedia. According to Jerome he was citing IntCat!! So he has asked me to up-date him when I find anything out. And I shall.
Look, it is simple. If you mention a case then the reference source is given. If that source is the same reference for the next report you simply write "ditto pp.----" (whatever the page numbers are. If the source is not used again until report 15 then (if it was the first reference source) you write "Ibid 1pp---" and the page numbers. It is that simple yet Rogerson and Magonia (who seem impossible to get hold of), critical of so many writers/researchers and sources do not abide by the first rule of research: always cite your reference".
This is why Ufology is never taken seriously. People like me have to come along and then correct sources and details.
It's been a bad day as I just read David Haisell's A Question Of Control and wait til you see my review on THAT!
I just got an email from Jerome Clark and his source is Rogerson's IntCat so, basically, the report is useless unless I can find that source and I cannot find it in the IntCat entries.
Sadly, Ufologists quote and quote and quote with little regard to going directly to the original source and so the myth of a CE IIIK/Entity encounter becomes 'fact'.
Entries in IntCat I have had to correct using the original source.
So if you know the source Rogerson refers to (I heard nothing back from Magonia) please let me know.
I'm hoping that some of the Ufologists who pop by might be able to help. Seriously, I'm not asking a lot!
This 1930 case is quoted over and over online and Rogerson's IntCat cites "MacGregor 1955, p.200" as the source but it does not give the source. It is not A. A. MacGregor’s Peat Fire Flame because I have a copy and that was published in 1937 and no such case exists within it.
Most are citing Jerome Clark's UFO Encyclopaedia (I'm guessing volume 1) and since volume 1 and volume 2 are both selling for between £150-335 ($325-500+) and I don't have that kind of cash to throw around, I wondered whether one of you lovely folk had a copy and could check Clark's source for me?
Alexander Irvine and a friend were walking in
Smiddy Lane
when they saw a white light like a meteor. This light brightened and in it a
number of figures could be seen moving around. It was regarded locally as the
prevision of a nun’s death.
Note (TH): book published
1937 so contemporary not modern take on event.Awaiting copy of book.
Here we go again. People need to understand that scientists are always discovering things that create new noise out in space. Quasars, planets -there's a whole parcel of causes. So, while this sounds interesting, all other possible causes need to be ruled out first -it is a nightmare as the AOP Bureau's Signals From Space under Franklyn A. Davin-Wilson found out.
Oh, and then you have to ask if whoever sent the signals still exists as a civilisation now.
meh
Two Weird ‘Alien’ Radio Signals Are Detected From Outside Our Galaxy
Rob Waugh
Parkes
Astronomers
heard two mysterious radio signals from outside our galaxy -
unexplained blasts of radio energy which last a few milliseconds then
are never heard again.
Scientists using the Parkes radio
telescope in Australia heard two ‘Fast Radio Bursts’ this month -
separated by just 2.4 milliseconds, according to researchers at the Max
Planck Institute.
Radio telescopes have detected Fast Radio
Bursts since 2001 – incredibly short, high-energy pulses which last for a
few milliseconds and erupt with the energy the sun releases in a day.
But follow-up searches by non-radio telescopes have come up empty - leaving the source of the high-energy signals a mystery.
Astronomers
have previously speculated the signals could come from evaporating
black holes, or even from distant alien civilisations.
The new ‘double flash’ rules out some of the sources astronomers previously thought might cause Fast Radio Bursts.
For instance, the bursts could not be caused by neutron stars colliding - as they can collide only once.
Mysterious debris surrounding a star that scientists earlier this year
posited may be an alien megastructure is actually likely to be just
comets, according to NASA.
Damn! And here we were hoping. Anyway, if you are disappointed (you never really expected a huge craft of some type did you?). Here is the report by NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory:
A star called KIC 8462852 has been in the news recently for
unexplained and bizarre behavior. NASA's Kepler mission had monitored
the star for four years, observing two unusual incidents, in 2011 and
2013, when the star's light dimmed in dramatic, never-before-seen ways.
Something had passed in front of the star and blocked its light, but
what?
Scientists first reported the findings in September, suggesting a
family of comets as the most likely explanation. Other cited causes
included fragments of planets and asteroids.
A new study using data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope addresses
the mystery, finding more evidence for the scenario involving a swarm of
comets. The study, led by Massimo Marengo of Iowa State University,
Ames, is accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
One way to learn more about the star is to study it in infrared
light. Kepler had observed it in visible light. If a planetary impact,
or a collision amongst asteroids, were behind the mystery of KIC
8462852, then there should be an excess of infrared light around the
star. Dusty, ground-up bits of rock would be at the right temperature to
glow at infrared wavelengths.
At first, researchers tried to look for infrared light using NASA's
Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer, or WISE, and found none. But those
observations were taken in 2010, before the strange events seen by
Kepler -- and before any collisions would have kicked up dust.
To search for infrared light that might have been generated after the
oddball events, researchers turned to Spitzer, which, like WISE, also
detects infrared light. Spitzer just happened to observe KIC 8462852
more recently in 2015.
"Spitzer has observed all of the hundreds of thousands of stars where
Kepler hunted for planets, in the hope of finding infrared emission
from circumstellar dust," said Michael Werner, the Spitzer project
scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California,
and the lead investigator of that particular Spitzer/Kepler observing
program.
But, like WISE, Spitzer did not find any significant excess of
infrared light from warm dust. That makes theories of rocky smashups
very unlikely, and favors the idea that cold comets are responsible.
It's possible that a family of comets is traveling on a very long,
eccentric orbit around the star. At the head of the pack would be a very
large comet, which would have blocked the star's light in 2011, as
noted by Kepler. Later, in 2013, the rest of the comet family, a band of
varied fragments lagging behind, would have passed in front of the star
and again blocked its light.
By the time Spitzer observed the star in 2015, those comets would be
farther away, having continued on their long journey around the star.
They would not leave any infrared signatures that could be detected.
According to Marengo, more observations are needed to help settle the case of KIC 8462852.
"This is a very strange star," he said. "It reminds me of when we
first discovered pulsars. They were emitting odd signals nobody had ever
seen before, and the first one discovered was named LGM-1 after 'Little
Green Men.'"
In the end, the LGM-1 signals turned out to be a natural phenomenon.
"We may not know yet what's going on around this star," Marengo observed. "But that's what makes it so interesting."
Ames manages the Kepler and K2 missions for NASA's Science Mission
Directorate. JPL managed Kepler mission development. Ball Aerospace
& Technologies Corp. operates the flight system with support from
the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of
Colorado in Boulder.
JPL manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for NASA's Science
Mission Directorate, Washington. Science operations are conducted at the
Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology in
Pasadena. Spacecraft operations are based at Lockheed Martin Space
Systems Company, Littleton, Colorado. Data are archived at the Infrared
Science Archive housed at the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center at
Caltech.
I'm hoping that some of the Ufologists who pop by might be able to help. Seriously, I'm not asking a lot!
