BTS RAW #10 - Deepening UAP Secrecy & ? A Few Notes

John Greenwald's summation at the end of his video is spot on. As I noted in my last post from the very outset of this AATIP, AAWSAP, Elizondo farce the one thing that was strikingly obvious is that the UFO community (it isn't really but we'll call it that for the sake of argument) to "UFO believers" have been gas-lighted and slowly told what they wanted to hear.

Above: Captain Edward J. Ruppelt former head of USAF Project Blue Book who coined the term "UFO"

From the outset Elizondo and his counter intelligence people have led the narrative: the press and media and those wanting to jump on that particular bandwagon have started to use the term "UAP" and they have to explain to everyone that "its an official term for UFO -same thing". Incorrect. The person who officially coined the term UFO was the then head of USAF Project Blue Book Captain Edward J. Ruppelt. In fact "UFOB" was also used in typical military style -Unidentified Flying OBject. It is a term a lot of us used since the 1970s (UFOB) to denote a report of what is obviously a constructed object rather than just a vague light. In fact, during the late 1970s and early 1980s we tried using the term UAP within Ufology and do you know what? After a few years we had to go back to UFO as having to explain constantly that UAP was the same as UFO was getting monotonous. The USAF never used the term UAP and it seems to have been selected as a project hook word.

All the UFO groups wanting to be hip and cool are now using the term UAP and advising (telling) its people to use the acronym as it is "relevant". And that in itself is causing arguments and confusion amongst Ufologists -I heard from one that he was told to change the UFO term used in a report to UAP and re-submit. Slam-dunk for the "Elizondo Camp".

All the usual media hucksters in Ufology have now started dropping the term UAP into their UFO lies, twisting of facts and using solved incidents as "still a mystery" disinformation. Those Ufologists are the saps helping to promote this deceit.

The "UFO believers" are accepting the words of those who have deceived them for decades by lying about UFOs and ridiculing witnesses because they are claiming to be "UFO whistle-blowers" and Elizondo is not a very good actor and watching his performances they are well scripted but the key "hook" words are delivered badly and why people do not realise he is gaslighting is not surprising...except it is to be expected because they are told what they want to hear even if there is absolutely no facts to back up what they are being told.

When I wrote that I did not believe Elizondo and gave a breakdown as to why I got some very personal attacks from UFO believers -not counter arguments which are ALWAYS welcome but insults and not one of these people knew me or anything about my work. Elizondo has his pets well trained and ready to go for anyone who even doubts his word. His behaviour is of someone who knows the long play con is reliant on people believing.

Why should Greenwald be the subject of some vicious trolling, at the seeming instigation of Elizondo when all he is doing -and providing the documentation to prove it (which Elizondo has never done)- is trying to sort out an AATIP/AAWSAP (think about that last acronym) timeline and find out more about the people involved?  UFO believers should be encouraging him to dig deeper and get more facts but instead he has become (in their eyes thanks to expert guidance) "the huckster", "the con man" and worse. 

1. Establish the base story

2. Drop in key "hooks"

3. Add claims while stating "this cannot be proven because of---"

4.Set yourself up as a man fighting the establishment

5.  Once the mob is hooked lead the narrative and turn the mob against those who might point out problems in the story.

6. Create discontent and establish a chaotic situation of doubt and inter-group/personality rivalry.

Sound familiar?   I will NOT use the term UAP and, being honest here, I long ago left the silly lights-in-the-sky subject for specialisation and sitting on the outside I can see this all playing out because I am not just going to bloggers oir people with You Tube channels who preach what I want to hear. 

Read my previous post. UFO believers and Ufology opened up the doors and closed them behind the men who are out to spread chaos and deceit. There is no "UFO disclosure" coming (again) because the subject -as I stated a couple months back- has now been classified by the very people hailed as heroes for saying they want the truth out there.

There is nothing new here and all that is going to happen is that we will hear far less about official UFO reports. Remember the names of all the people involved in this from the start and start joining the dots.  Skinwalker Ranch may well be a part of the plan -again:look at all of the names and ASK QUESTIONS!

Bigfoot: Best Evidence

When referring to Roosevelt and the "Bigfoot" story read this account:

https://www.rougaroustudios.com/bkotf-podcast/bkotf-blog/2019/8/25/the-teddy-roosevelt-bigfoot-story

The Debunkers are Now The Heroes...HOW Did That Happen?

 

Gas lighting is going on.

Just look at the indepth and intense amount of work put in by John Greenwald Jnr of The Black Vault on a Luis Elizondo, "The Pentagon UFO Project", the AATIP, AAWSAP and contradictory dates and stories.

Look at Steven Greenstreet's work on the same subject: all fully referenced and all pointing to some very suspect goings on.

Millions of dollars ($22m) were given to Senator Harry Read's friend and financial supporter Robert Bigelow. A tender for carrying out the research work should have been open but only Bigelow's BAAS was involved. Watch the videos.

Out of the blue a UFO whistle blower named Elizondo told the world there was a secret UFO project and that he was in charge of it. Except he wasn't. It's like Nick Pope claiming to have been THE Ministry of Defence UFO investigator when he was simply a desk man but Elizondo claimed his budget was in the millions. Except it was not. Who is backing him up? Other persons involved in or formerly involved in intelligence.  

Out of the blue we are seeing secret UFO photos released that look like balloons and so on. Nothing there to make us shout out "WOW!" Those photos should not have been released say the people who released them and we more or less know that these are now IFOs (Identified Flying Objects).

Again -whistle blowers in the "Nimitz encounters".  A lot of whistle blowing but no solid evidence. A show Senate hearing where nothing is released other than what was known before. 

Someone drops the term "Tic-Tac" UFO and now every UFO being reported is a "Tic-Tac". All the media is talking and writing about "Tic-Tac" UFOs. Organisations like MUFON are now focussing on the crowd pulling good press stories "Tic-Tac" UFOs being reported -just like they pushed grey abduction reports when it was hot while kicking out anything that was not a claimed Grey abduction. They promoted the frauds who pushed back work in Ufology 30 years.

Orbs then became hot and reports were even changed to make UFOs "orbs" -remember how "Rods" were also pulled into Ufology. If it sells to the media and pulls in paying members or  gets people buying tickets for lectures it is the "only" thing going.

We are seeing this in the way that reporters are being fed the line "they are UAP not UFOs" and so TV shows and bloggers and others are all jumping on the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena band wagon. We were using UAP in the 1980s but dropped it because people had to be told "UAPs are UFOs". Using UAP as a term the media is being led into a new direction -its a term that is the "hook" and it goes on from there.

USOs -Unidentified Submarine Objects (reports of which I investigated in the 1970s and 1980s) were nothing. Even the less than factual TV show UFO Hunters failed to enliven the subject. But with the "Tic-Tac" videos we have have a new angle -"trans-medium" or as we have called it since the 1950s " a UFO flying through the air and entering the sea". There  is nothing new with objects entering or leaving the seas and oceans but suddenly "USO" is the new hook and we have videos and TV shows talking about USOs - "if a USO is seen then locally there is an alien abduction taking place".

People in the media and Ufology are being given the "we are not saying this is correct/this is connected" but given a heavy 'hint' to follow that 'lead'.

The "mass Tic-Tac sightings are drones"...up to 50-100 sighted over a short period so a mass UFO UAP event. Last year I posted a military news convention item about how "mass drone flights" as well as mass mini ("micro") drone fleets can be deployed. What a coincidence. And after lying for decades about no UFO study and ridiculing the public about UFO reports we now have the debunkers being hailed as hero truth seekers while the truth seekers with decades of work to their credit (and all fully documented) are the "debunkers" who are viciously trolled online!

Just ask HOW that happened.

The UFO "believers" are fed the line they WANT to hear and will not accept anything going against that.  From the first time I saw Elizondo the one thing that came into my head was "This fella is gas-lighting". I posted that I did not believe his account and...the really nasty Twitter responses was quite funny and all personally aimed at me (from people who did not know me and I never knew them).

Ufology is being guided by people who really should NOT be leading the narrative and some (Elizondo) are "doing a Trump" by having their "followers" attack people online who just disagree with a claim they made. These people (no such thing as "ex Intelligence man") are leading the narrative and that's it.

Read and listen to the evidence not the smoke and mirrors.

7News - Ross Coulthart - UAP / UFO - Full documentary - Aug 21 2022

"We need to fire something INTO a UFO!"

We (AOPB) wanted to try various things to get more data on UFOs. Firstly, we had to be mobile and get to an area where UFO activity had picked up (they were never that helpful but...)

The Rocket Research Group was a simple idea. Up and down the UK in the 1970s/1980s there were rocket men: they built and launched small rockets but mainly in places like the Yorkshire Moors.

Franklyn Davin-Wilson had managed to design a small package that fitted into the nose cone of the rockets (the rockets were about 3m or so in length) with wires leading out to external sensors. We had everything worked out and then...

The Civil Aviation Authority told us "No". But as they were only a "cooperating" authority we carried on until a much higher organisation head said "no". "We cannot possibly risk even the remotest possibility that a rocket would hit something sending it off course or sending fragments all over the place."

Well, that was us told.

The next idea was sensor packages fitted to helium balloons that were tethered and fitted to the back of an old Bedford van so we could get directly under any UFO and send the balloon up at speed. We could not aim a balloon like we could a rocket but getting right under a phenomenon and (as someone put it) "Shoving an helium balloon up its jacksy" seemed fair enough.

Unfortunately, as the balloon and gear was fitted we were told that new regulations meant we could not purchase the large amount of helium we wanted. Party entertainers could purchase the stuff but not us. This seemed to be a bureaucratic thing and we tried but...

Above Franklyn A. Davin-Wilson , MBCS, one of the original AOP Bureau team

At this point my colleague Franklyn suggested (sarcastically) that "We ought to all be equipped with catapults and small sensor packs and when a blessed UFO turns up we all aim, fire and see who gets lucky!"

We were basically blocked. Then a few ideas came to mind. I could think them up or suggest them but was not technically qualified to try building anything. There was an idea to use oscilloscopes, get cooperation from radio hams -it went on and on. Then, through a contact of Air Vice Marshal Sir Victor Goddard we got a radar operator volunteer but I asked how we were going to put him to use and the response was that "off hours" (yes, radar stations did close at RAF bases "after hours") there was "an old radar unit we might use so long as you do not draw attention".

So, when it was permitted, we sat around while the radar man did his stuff. Quite boring. One night we got a radar return at 0200 hrs -something coming in from the west and on a trajectory that would take it over Kent and out over the English Channel. Franklyn looked at the screen and tapped it and asked the radar man "Is this set working properly? That is covering a hell of a distance quickly!" The man checked his little red note book and told us the date. "We know the date" I responded and he turned the radar set off which caused Franklyn to burst out loud with "What are you doing?!" The man looked at us and said quite nervously "We never saw that. It is not a UFO. We just never saw that".

We did not speculate but a week later the radar project was gone.

As the original AOP people died off -Dave Cowdy first then Franklyn (only 46 years old) the team shrank and some of the remaining members could offer occasional advice but were way too old for field work. Lord (Brinsley) Clancarty and some of his House of Lords friends with an interest in UFOs and the right connections passed away as did Goddard. At the end of the day I was the main investigator and was still getting cooperation from official bodies (which had never been obstructive) and as the early small drones came in they were expensive but could carry the old sensor packages and I proposed using drones when UFO activity peaked and it seemed that at last things were coming together. Then the last two funders passed away.

The Blair government came in and somehow it was made aware of the officially unofficial work and blocks were immediately put in place to prevent any "silly UFO stuff" embarrassing them and I was left out to dry. All the promises made in the 1970s were now gone.

I still think that the idea of drones with sensor packages -especially now that drones are cheaper and the data packages can be made smaller and cameras fitted- are a good idea but that needs to be backed up by the technicians who can analyse data and NOT rely on just a drone operator making a claim. It needs hard science back-up and probably financing also.

There, I have now "blabbed" after 40 years.

 

Who Are The Watchers?

 

As we head toward blog closure date how about I tell you about "the watchers"?

Back in the late 1970s I was a member of the British Flying Saucer Bureau (f 1952) and the crackpottery that went on could fill a book.  However, I managed to arrange a number of Sky watches and the purpose of these was to acquaint people with the night sky. One of these sky watches and its location, was altered by the BFSB committee for some silly reason so no choice. We ended up in the quiet countryside, in a field surrounded by hedgerows in Failand which is near Bristol.

At one point I noticed an odd silence only broken by whispers occasionally. I looked at my friend Franklyn (Franklyn Davin-Wilson) and asked what was going on? He had no idea so we sidled up to two committee members and asked what was going on and why people were spooked? One looked at us and whispered "The Watcher!"

It seems that in previous sky watches (the reason they stopped doing them) a dark figure had appeared standing at a distance from the sky watchers but watching them. Never said a word and never approached them. Eventually the figure vanished. 

You have to remember that after Albert K. Bender's breakdown and his Men In Black story he had sent a warning to all sections of the International Flying Saucer Bureau that "The Men In Black are coming!" and the BFSB put a lot of its records ands materials in a safe box and waited with dread. That was in the mid 1950s. They were still waiting in the 1970s and 1990s. 

None of this ever made sense to me. You are going to continue with flying saucery but some papers and files are stored away "safely"? HOW does that stop MIB visiting you? And, after four decades the files and records were still being hidden -as head of investigation and research I was not even allowed to view files. This was the silly mindset that had to be dealt with. Even in the early 2000s Denis Plunket (in his late 70s) was talking about the MIB and how they might visit any day. So, the whole watcher thing seemed silly.

I told Franklyn to keep an eye on the Watcher as I moved back into the crowd then made my way carefully through a hedgerow and circled around and then reached a point where I could see the greyish figure and then moved closer as quietly as I could in the dark. I then leapt and grabbed the Watcher.  The shock and surprise resulted in some good Anglos-Saxon words coming from his lips.

The "Watcher" was a man out "rabbiting" who had seen this "strange group of people standing still in the middle of a field, in the dark and looking up at the sky". He though he had stumbled on a witches coven or worse. I explained what was going on and got a strange look before he left the area.

I moved into the field to tell my companions and all I heard was a woman scream and a man say out loud "Bloody hell -he's coming toward us!" I put my torch on and called out. The mystery of the Watcher was solved. Or was it?

A couple of people swore blind that the grey figure had vanished before I got to it and thought the poacher had then turned up. How could they see where I was behind a thick hedgerow when they did not even know I had left the group? How did they see all of this in the pitch black as they were at least 200 yards(200m) away and I could not see more than 10 feet (3m)?

Naturalists, farmers and even poachers out at night probably explained away previous "Watchers" but no -they were not having any of it. After all "The Watcher" had been seen, what -10 times? or was it 20 times? No, someone was sure that it was more than that. Until I set the 1970s sky watches in motion the BFSB had not had a sky watch in the 1970s, 1960s and possibly for a great deal of the late 1950s. Yet, this legendary Watcher was always seen?

These are the sort of people who when you tell them that "Ancient Egyptian scripts noted quite clearly that two large glowing flying saucers had landed near to the pyramids with hundreds of observers" will immediately say "See? Historical facts how can you explain that away?" and another will add "Well, we know they built the pyramids" and end of story. Will any of them check sources? No. Why? Well "Why would he say and write that if it was not true?"

From 1948-2022 that mindset still exists and the bunko Ufologists continue to make money out of them and no matter how many times you expose the frauds...the suckers will keep buying.

Over A Decade

 I've made appeals, asked for comments and after well over a decade...nothing.  Doubt anything will change but here is a count down to closure

5