Gas lighting is going on.
Just look at the indepth and intense amount of work put in by John Greenwald Jnr of The Black Vault on a Luis Elizondo, "The Pentagon UFO Project", the AATIP, AAWSAP and contradictory dates and stories.
Look at Steven Greenstreet's work on the same subject: all fully referenced and all pointing to some very suspect goings on.
Millions of dollars ($22m) were given to Senator Harry Read's friend and financial supporter Robert Bigelow. A tender for carrying out the research work should have been open but only Bigelow's BAAS was involved. Watch the videos.
Out of the blue a UFO whistle blower named Elizondo told the world there was a secret UFO project and that he was in charge of it. Except he wasn't. It's like Nick Pope claiming to have been THE Ministry of Defence UFO investigator when he was simply a desk man but Elizondo claimed his budget was in the millions. Except it was not. Who is backing him up? Other persons involved in or formerly involved in intelligence.
Out of the blue we are seeing secret UFO photos released that look like balloons and so on. Nothing there to make us shout out "WOW!" Those photos should not have been released say the people who released them and we more or less know that these are now IFOs (Identified Flying Objects).
Again -whistle blowers in the "Nimitz encounters". A lot of whistle blowing but no solid evidence. A show Senate hearing where nothing is released other than what was known before.
Someone drops the term "Tic-Tac" UFO and now every UFO being reported is a "Tic-Tac". All the media is talking and writing about "Tic-Tac" UFOs. Organisations like MUFON are now focussing on the crowd pulling good press stories "Tic-Tac" UFOs being reported -just like they pushed grey abduction reports when it was hot while kicking out anything that was not a claimed Grey abduction. They promoted the frauds who pushed back work in Ufology 30 years.
Orbs then became hot and reports were even changed to make UFOs "orbs" -remember how "Rods" were also pulled into Ufology. If it sells to the media and pulls in paying members or gets people buying tickets for lectures it is the "only" thing going.
We are seeing this in the way that reporters are being fed the line "they are UAP not UFOs" and so TV shows and bloggers and others are all jumping on the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena band wagon. We were using UAP in the 1980s but dropped it because people had to be told "UAPs are UFOs". Using UAP as a term the media is being led into a new direction -its a term that is the "hook" and it goes on from there.
USOs -Unidentified Submarine Objects (reports of which I investigated in the 1970s and 1980s) were nothing. Even the less than factual TV show UFO Hunters failed to enliven the subject. But with the "Tic-Tac" videos we have have a new angle -"trans-medium" or as we have called it since the 1950s " a UFO flying through the air and entering the sea". There is nothing new with objects entering or leaving the seas and oceans but suddenly "USO" is the new hook and we have videos and TV shows talking about USOs - "if a USO is seen then locally there is an alien abduction taking place".
People in the media and Ufology are being given the "we are not saying this is correct/this is connected" but given a heavy 'hint' to follow that 'lead'.
The "mass Tic-Tac sightings are drones"...up to 50-100 sighted over a short period so a mass UFO UAP event. Last year I posted a military news convention item about how "mass drone flights" as well as mass mini ("micro") drone fleets can be deployed. What a coincidence. And after lying for decades about no UFO study and ridiculing the public about UFO reports we now have the debunkers being hailed as hero truth seekers while the truth seekers with decades of work to their credit (and all fully documented) are the "debunkers" who are viciously trolled online!
Just ask HOW that happened.
The UFO "believers" are fed the line they WANT to hear and will not accept anything going against that. From the first time I saw Elizondo the one thing that came into my head was "This fella is gas-lighting". I posted that I did not believe his account and...the really nasty Twitter responses was quite funny and all personally aimed at me (from people who did not know me and I never knew them).
Ufology is being guided by people who really should NOT be leading the narrative and some (Elizondo) are "doing a Trump" by having their "followers" attack people online who just disagree with a claim they made. These people (no such thing as "ex Intelligence man") are leading the narrative and that's it.
Read and listen to the evidence not the smoke and mirrors.
No comments:
Post a Comment