When I first saw the released 'UFO' footage my first thought was that it did not look right. In fact I wondered whether an out of focus camera filming an aircraft might be to blame.
At that same time Steve Willis, a Wiltshire based Ufologist said that it looked like "bokeh" and the previous videos and this one explains that. In fact, it cannot be argued that it is not Bokeh unless you are one of those people to whom even a firefly is a UFO of extra terrestrial origin.
Then I saw the interviews with the uber-excited and hyper Jeremy Corbell and my next question was: WHY did the Pentagon release these videos to him? No disrespect to the man but I would have thought the major news outlets would have been top of the list. At the same ytime I answered my own question.
It is coming up toward the Ufologiocally hyped up presentation to Congress which I, like John Greenewald Jnr of The Black Vault, believe (mywords) that this is flim-flam. A con. The videos will be referred to but as "UFOs that became IFOs" (Identified Flying Objects) after investigation. Ratherlike the "Bat Balloon" photograph that, honestly, should not have fooled anyone. But look at the UFO press and world wide media attention this all got and now Corbell on a one man publicity campaign. I think that the main news media will find out why the Pentagon released all of this but will not give a damn. These were "considered UFOs (or UAP) but under further investigation were identified".
It is not the first time the Pentagon has domne this and it will not be the last and after June we are going to still be in the dark.
Well done comments. It is suspicious coming from overheated people as it is. Not enough time is being taken to look at the films carefully.
ReplyDelete