Getting away from the UFO crackpots and frauds we can say that some UFO reports are natural phenomena while others are misidentifications and they (excluding all "bright light" UFOs) are identified and thrown aside and that leads us with what appear to be solid, constructed craft which WE do not have.
If Russia, China or the US had these in the 1950s the world would be totally different now.
We can dismiss the "Greys" (Hopkins, Jacobs and, after looking at things again, to an extent even Mack) because prior to Hopkins we had short, large headed entities but NO GREYS (though Ufologists have started changing those reports). What Hopkins, but especially Jacobs, has written is pure nonsense and both are discredited.
We know certain stimuli can create a seemingly 100% physically real encounter for some people. Unless there is secondary, independent witness testimony then single witness events are excluded (but studied). That leaves us with incidents involving two or more percipients and if those have corroborating independent witnesses then you have a pretty solid case.
Abductions are very rare (I could write books on that...oh, I have...four!) and if those inside these seemingly constructed craft do not look wholly human and state that they are from another planet then they must be.
.jpg)
The encounters and physiological/psychological effects are genuine.
The radiation contamination are real.
Signs that something large landed are real.
Now in a criminal case that is almost 100% circumstantial/ anecdotal evidence. Does it give us 100% irrefutable evidence of aliens visiting?
No.
An abductee really needs to steal something or be involved in something Jacobs, Mack and Hopkins agreed to take part in -the Damocles Project -which might give results.
For every Adamski fraud or Cynthia Appleton there are cases presenting more evidence. Unfortunately my getting the chance to be involved in an encounter seem to be getting shorter but all we can do is gather the data.
No comments:
Post a Comment