At times I have struggled to post here with the main reason being that since 2011 there have been 50 comments -mainly conversations between myself and a friend- and absolutely no feedback at even the most basic level. No support. No book sales.
Basically I know what I am posting already and to ee the original material as well as illustrations and photos stolen and credit taken by others is the last straw.
I am deleting all the long, original posts and not updating. Life is to precious to waste.
Can I make it clear that up until the 15th October the UFO and Mystery Books are NOT being increased ion price.
I have to wait until the print on demand company announces what its new pricing will be and only then can the book prices be adjusted.
Therefore if you want to buy them at a low pricre that is NOT going to be repeated now is the time with...9 days left.
Well I offered the metal fragment up to anyone interested in buying and...nothing. I was asked about the other fragment that, according to the analysis, bore no resemblance to terrestrial materials?
This piece is up for sale too. What the heck do I need it for? Anyway this is the matter Margaret Fry got the other sample from.
I am told -again- that my "debunking and sceptical mind" is witholding vital UFO evidence (of a UFO crash on the Berwyn Mts in Wales) -as proven on samples of metal Margaret Fry had analysed and were found to be "no earthly material". See the image below.
The other item which Margaret Fry had a piece analysed from is pictured below. Again, she claims that the technical analysis carried out proves that this is not of earthly origin.
And so I am repeatedly accused of "witholding vital UFO evidence" and I state that I am not. Yes, Margaret Fry had the pieces analysed professionally but my opinion is still the same.
Therefore, I am putting this out there: the first metal fragment shown above is for sale at £10,000 the buyer arrange for a courier to collect. The person buying does so and there are no refunds. Margartet Fry claimed extraterrestrial origion and had lab results to prove it.
The second fragment will also cost £10,000 and the same deal applies.
Offer made. Now get off my back.
I think that the data shows that Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Alien Entity cases are rare. They may total (depending on what your criteria for acceptance are) just a couple of hundred reports and many have not been investigated to any degree.
I use the term Close Encounters of the Third Kind (CE3K) as I believe the plethora of encounter types put forward are confusing things. If you are going to use the 4th, 5th or whichever to indicate a suspected psychological case then just state "CE3K -Psychological". The vast majority of alleged "generational alien abductions" and "Greys" accounts can be dismissed. Hopkins and Jacobs et al just lost the plot and Jacobs in particular has flown into nonsensical fantasy.
Witnesses in UFO landings who saw entities only briefly were put under hypnosis to see "whether anything else happened thatthey had forgotten" and from there we went into the Greys and generational abductions and even pre-birth abductions and past lives abductions. No one within Ufology seriously questioned this.
In fact the utter ignorance of self claimed "veteran Ufologists" who claim to have been investigating for "thirty plus years" is amazing. Refer to CE3Ks and you hear "Well, people reporting those little critters" and that followed by "Whatever that's meant to be about" -moronic. You "believe" these are alien (or the current favourite for which there is absolutely no scientific data) or"other dimensional" and "multiversal" -good for sci fi and comic books or movies but really. The point is just what or whom do these "seasoned veterans" actually think are piloting their extra terrestrial craft?
It is almost as though they get their Ufological training from trash TV documentaries, You Tube and the old Weekly World News. The very first quesation that they should be asking themselves is; "If these are extra terrestrial craft -what is controlling/piloting them?" That was the very first question I asked as a smooth-faced newbie in 1973. Sadly, all I really got was the George Adamski and other contactee "space brothers" crap and at the time I asked outright why, if these space brothers were here to stop us having a nuclear war and destroying ourselves why the bloody hell were they just whizzing around the planet picking up some of the most ridiculous and crooked people around?
If you see a Boeing 747 or a military jet you KNOW that it is being piloted. That makes logical sense. So is "lard on the brain" stopping Ufologists realising the same about their claimed "extraterrestrial craft"? Come on. After 30-35 years they sit on their asses reading UFO books and magazines and all the fake documents put out there but skirt past anything looking at CE3K?
I once watched a You Tube video in which an ex cop turned Ufologist was talking about his crack team of investigators, showing off files and maps and do you know what had occupied their timeas crack MUFON investigators for several months? A small point of light high in the sky that had moved erratically before vanishing -"only a pinpoint of light but it is significant". How? Do you know how much space junk there is up there and do you realise that not every satellite put into orbit is officially listed so you can check what time it passes overhead?
Jacques Vallee, Ted Phillips and many others have much lauded 'data bases' but when you look atwhat they have gathered and listed as actual factual events but that were known as hoaxes or explained in the 1960s you notice that thpose data bases are pointless. When you see them referring to accounts from newspapers as the source because no one in 30, 40 or 55 years has actually investigated the cases then you realise Ufology has nothing. When you tick off one known hoax from a supposedly "scientific catalogue" it is bad enough but 10? 20? that is just a new form of collecting so that you can brag how many reports you have.
If you look into as many cases as possible and get as much data as you can (which I have since 1974) then you realise that many accounts are newspaper, Ufological or other hoaxes and many are misidentifications -one landed UFO with an occupant carrying outrepairs on it during the False French UFO Wave of 1954 turned out to be a broken down bus -known locally and later picked up on by others but that case is still cited today -inbcluding by Jacques Vallee.
What I meant in that post was this: not "many hundreds" and certainly not "many thousands" of 'credible CE3Ks but maybe 150-200 that need more looking into. Certainly NOT "millions of humans abducted by aliens".
Each report has to be treated individually not as part of a clump of reports.
Apparently, I did not realise this until I checked the date, over three years ago I asked any blog reader (and there are a lot of you) who had read or knew of a report or article about someone who had encountered a UFO and entities as a one off experience to get in touch.
Nothing.
In fact, I know from having spoken to a couple people that when reporting such incidents thaey were told that they were probably lifelong abductees. They pointed out that they were not and that this was a one off incident. They were told again that they WERE lifelong abductees because all ofvtheresaearch pointed to this in "every" such incident even if only a landed UFO and entities seen but no interaction. They were given the option of being put in touch with a "specialist abductees group" or their report could not be looked into.
This is exactly what I predicted would happen well over 20 years ago in articles and posts and later in my books. There are many credible accounts of UFO/entity encounters from 1950 up until the time everyone went "grey abductions" crazy. Look at Euporia, Mississippi in 1973 where racial prejudice reared its ugly head; local investigators chasing up any and every UFO incident but refusing to look at a multi witness incident on a U.S. Highway -because those witnesses were "black" -MUFON still refuses to even consider the case.
Imagine that you genuinely see a strange craft land and entities emerge -there is no interacytion but after a couple of minutes the entities re-enter the object and it leaves. You report it and you are told you were abducted. A dashboard clock may well tell you that you can account for every minute but as David Jacobs stated in his UFO evangelical style -"You saw a UFO and it vanished: YOU WERE ABDUCTED!" no question about it. Are you seriously going to have to go through all the messing around and state you were abducted just to get somone to take yourreport seriously....or do you back away and keep quiet?
What surprised me, because you are never told this but have to dig to find out, is that many percipients or witnesses in these events would never have been known and we would know nothing about the Betty & Barney Hill, the Liberty, Kentucky incident or many others if it had not been for ufologists exposing these people to the press or betraying confidences for their own gain.
Think about that. The Betty and Barney Hill account and all the extra evidence surrounding it -taken to the grave or a family secret. The 1976 Mona Stafford, Louise Smith and Elaine Thomas abduction event -unknown and taken to the grave (I believe Stafford was still alive as of 2020). Even the Walton case would not be known had it not been for the actions of Ufologists at the time.
In fact, after writing my last book dealing with the subject, Beyond UFO Contact: Aliens from Mind, Time & Space (2020), I sat down and looked at the reports, both abductions and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, from 1950-1995 and realised that at a rough count over 50 we would not know about if Ufologists had not broken confidential agreements with those involved. The figure is probably higher and it is a sad fact that many persons reporting such events were never even spoken to by investigators after 30 years and when some were those self righteous lazy clod-hoppers had the audacity to chastise reporters and newspapers for bad reporting! Absolutely no "If an investigator had gotten his lazy ass out of a chair and bothered we would not have been quoting incorrect facts for over thirty years" oh no. Everyone's fault but their own. So after 40, 50 and 60+ years many of those percipients are no longer with us. We've lost testimony. Eupora would today be classed as a major incident but decades on not one witness (that is still alive) has been spoken to.
Here is another fact worth considering; I know of several incidents where news got out and reached ufologists and the shameful behaviour of those 'truth seekers' made the witnesses withdraw and we lost testimony -one 'investigator' told me that the witness to a landing was obviously a "UFOnut" because he claimed "something" left the landed objkect. In another series ofg events at a quarry in the UK ufologists let the localpress and media know what was going on -this led to witnesses seeing chuckling TV presenters and reporters recounting their "tales". One witness to a landing refused outright to speak and workers at the quarry had told the BBC that if their mocking reporter returned he would be sent for a flight over the edge ofthe quarry.
There are cases in which someone hides, observes a landing and an entity gets out and after a minute or so re-enters the object which takes off but they are no longer in hiding but standing out in the open and a brief encounter was obviously far more involved and years later this was indicated, however, the secret went with them to the grave. M. Mass at Valensole, France was a similar case. When you realise that a straight forward narrative that should go from A to E does so but misses out B, C and D, you can ask why but the person involved will either say they were 'mistaken' or "No. I am never going to say what else happened".
How many witnesses/percipients have encountered something but seeing all the TV and You Tube trash decided that they are "not getting involved in that crap!" or just accepted it as Bob Taylor did after his encounter at Livingstone as "It happened. You get on with your life"? This is a line repeated by a number of percipients whose lives were shattered by an encounter but afterwards (in some cases suffering physical and mental trauma) decide that it happened and they have to get on with their lives. How many have decided this that we do not know about because fiction has taken over from fact or because they do not want to be known as "another one of those crazy UFO abductees" (even if they aren't?
Hopkins and Jacobs along with others has made it almost impossible for someone to report a brief encounter and with MUFON there is the fear that personal details (supposedly confidential) might be sold on?
I am not a debunker and never have been. I am a sceptic and I look at the evidence and assess cases by evidence or by making a decision as to how credible someone is. That should be clear from my books. Until I actually encounter an alien spacecraft I cannot state that aliens are landing on Earth. Even going by what percipients state I cannot say that but if everything points to them not lying and there is back-up evidence such as unconnected observers, etc all I can state is that they seem genuine so it is then up to readers to decide extraterrestrial or not.
But we need the testimony because it cannot all be dismissed by genuine debunkers who insist every single observer is "mistaken" or "suffering an altered state" (which they clearly do not understand) and if the accounts are genuine....
