These are just some quick notes.
First thing we need to mention is this UAP/UFO report going to Congress "in June". Quite honestly, when this was announced I got suspicious.
If you have to gather the case reports and then analyse the data to see whether there is a mundane explanation that can take weeks. If the report cannot be easily dismissed as "Explained" then you need to consult others in various fields and they all take time to check and double check their own opinions on a report and we are not talking one but perhaps 3-5 experts in their fields. You are looking at months of work there.
To this you then have to add your own opinion and analysis after editing and compiling the experts' opinions and discussing threat or other assessments. Even if you leave in the names of witnesses and technical breakdown that is, at speed a time frame of six months and that is before the said "final report" is assessed within the corridors of power and passed back down for release assessment.
A serious report is going to take at minimum around a year yet here we are told that one was ready within a couple of months. There's a funny smell there that makes me check the soles of my shoes.
Then we have all the "confirmed" UAP footage and stills that are 'leaked' and/or officially released BUT the officials will not give any other information meaning that these could be all explainable but when they were initially submitted they were classed as UAP/UFOs (then the explanation came but they are not telling you that).
George Knapp -now there is a source I have been suspicious of ever since the Skinwalker Ranch bunkum and book -hey, anyone remember Skinwalker was a "thing" before it became more You Tube/TV fake pop culture? More distortion of the truth and disinformation came from Knapp and his connections over that than any event before (excepting Roswell). Now here is Knapp, all pally with Luis Elizondo who conveniently became the focus for the whole AATIP and UAP/UFO investigation but of course, he can tell us no more because he "took the oath" but, gosh darn it, "elements within the Pentagon" are trying to discredit him and have even destroyed all of his emails and files (no -this never happens unless it can be used against someone and "bring them down" but let's look at that. "Yes, we did look at UFOs as a potential threat to our nation but we found no evidence of that so its as big a mystery to us as it is to everyone else" -that admission just tells people that the government did the right thing but ....mystery. Big deal. Is that going to bring down anyone? No.
Elizondo keeps using the same "I am sat here, humble and willing to tell you what I can" posture and positioning. This is all for domestic U.S. consumption anyway (they really do not care about outside the U.S. unless it helps them hide new tech testing from enemies). "I took an oath the serve the people and my country" / "I am a patriot and believe in our Constitution" / "Elected officials are there to serve the public and not the other way around" / "If they do not reveal the truth I goddam will armed with The Bill of Rights" / "I will stand for Congress and I will make each and every one of them accountable and I know the names" / "I served my country in and out of uniform" (wonderful how his absolutely hush-hush ultra top secret involvement in work against Al Qaeda keeps getting mentioned and it was only discovered (planted) after a lot of work on other subjects. "I served my country and I am on a Kill List -which did not go down well with my family".
Patriot, serving his country, fighting terrorist and getting put on a kill list, ready to take down the anonymous "power brokers" (while making sure that he tells us 99% of people at the Pentagon "are good people"). He wants the truth and the American people MUST have the truth.
To me, looking at all the interviews one thing strikes me and I spent 40 plus years investigating and talking to people; Elizondo's posture, the moves and little touches (deep breath, sit back, adjust baseball cap) is a con. He is gaslighting. Gaslighting is a little more complicated than this but a quick definition online: "Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person or a group covertly sows seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or group, making them question their own memory, perception, or judgment.
John Greenewald Jr of the Black Vault has twice now been praised for his work by Elizondo and the first time was a tad to watch but the latest was outright bull-shit and I could smell it all the way back here in the UK. He laid it on so thick; Greenewald and his work is mentioned in high circles and he scares some of these people. Greenewald thanks Elizondo for the words ("for those words") and that along with his expression shows that he is not buying it.
And the only person at the Pentagon who is allowed to speak on UFOs is obstructive and able to bend the truth...and also wrote a paper on how to use deception via information release (we used to call that "Grey Propaganda".
"Grey Propaganda"-a tad of truth but with twists and false bitsof info added to make even the sceptics believe but there is no one identifiable source or person at the core of it.
This is opposed to "Black Propaganda" - False or unverified propaganda, especially appearing to come from an enemy's own sources; disinformation. Including setting up (framing) of individuals such as child porn on their computer, lots of sudden unexplained money in their bank account, planting of evidence to show that they belonged to an illegal organisation and so on. Dirty work,
But what if there is an actual report? Well, the chances are that as we are dealing with persons versed in counter intelligences as well as deception and taking into account the "long con" it is very likely one prepared especially to look like the work was done and these are the findings but, you know, everyone has seen the video clips and images and when they were submitted as UAP they looked interesting but after some hard work it was found that one was a Batman helium balloon and .....so on and so forth.
But why? Most Americans are said to believe in UFO (extra terrestrial) visitors and it has become a big pop culture subject. Ahh, the American people have always been easy to manipulate on one thing, however; a threat. Look at wildlife programmes on US TV -THIS is out there and it is GOING TO KILL YOU. And "THAT is after your KIDS AND PETS!" and it moves into most areas and creates a paranoid that gets people asking "What is our government doing about this?!" From immigrants, to trade, to wildlife and even to Bigfoot the seeds of fear help authorities locally and nationally do what they want -with the support of the people.
So, are UAP/UFOs Russian? Chinese? Those are the "Big Two" and paranoia and fear of both have been worked into the American psyche -look at daily news stories (and "goddamit those Chinese have killed hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens and YOU could be next!"). What if -and all citizens have seen the UFO TV programmes and heard friends or relatives talk about UFO sightings and abductions- this IS all alien? Or, we can't be sure but we "can rule out terrestrial governments" (so "Aliens" but without saying so) -"Remember Pearl Harbour -but this time it could be the Continental United States or our planet!"
Hmm. If only there could be some way to get more money -increase our "special" defence budget? We are talking billions in deals and side deals here. Here you are, Congressfolk -we are currently stumped and incapable of defending the United States based on current defence technology." Question: "How can we change that situation?" Response: "Well, we have technology development planned for but not the budget...."
Boom
Is this all just to get more funding? Is it that simple?
We'll need to wait and see.
When it comes down to it I do not believe Elizondo was in charge of a project. He is so obviously -facial expressions and body language not to mention what he says are all shouting out "FRAUD!" Give it a year or two and someone who is not brainwashed will come up with the truth....it won't be Elizondo.
No comments:
Post a Comment