John Greenewald comes up with another provocative video. Provocative for people who will accept anything without question if it can be slanted to their way of thinking.
Greenewald is correct in trying to get to the bottom of the project names. If those in charge, associated with it or backing the various projects cannot get the name right then something is rotten in the state of Denmark (apologies to any Danes -its an expression).
When those same people cannot give the correct date for when a project began then its beginning to smell like the local refuse dump in summer heat.
When those same people cannot give a straight answer as to who did what and what money was or was not involved then you've just stuck your face in the refuse tip during summer heat.
There should be one date and if there was a transition of projects a second date for that. Either everyone involved is lying or they are trying to back-stab and undermine others for their own reasons. But why? Just simple stupid people doing simple stupid people things to get the maximum attention?
Or to obfuscate things?
To stick a big wedge in the cracks of Ufology and break it up even more? Ufology ios not a science and never was or will be because it produces no technical papers, no peer reviewing and it's events and groups go from folks who will chase up a light-in-the-sky report for months yet when someone reports a landing and entities they close their eyes and say "ludicrous" to the woo-woos who receive regular contact from space brothers and provide the good vegan recipes offered them to help humanity (I'm not kidding).
A majority will jump on something that becomes trendy -Budd Hopkins "abduction research" for instance and between Hopkins and Mack Ufology was stopped from advancing by 30 years because "If it ain't an abduction it aint interesting, baby!" Anti Hopkins folk had no idea about the material but were willing to name call and not do any real counter research themselves -which would have been scientific.
Racism, sexism and worse run through Ufology. Fact.
When I posted that I did not believe Elizondo's story as given there were some really nasty tweets at me including mocking my diabetes..yeah. Great IQs there, I tried to explain buit that got nastier responses and at that point I just let them scream away. Luckily, Twitter has no real relevance to me so I tend to ignore most things on it.
But this current AATIP, AAWSAP and who said and did what is distracting everyone from onething -the phenomenon. This smacks of an old style intelligence distracytion project and what was it Elizondo did again?
No comments:
Post a Comment