Face Book Groups and Contact

 

Face Book pages for those interested. 

 Fox  Wildcat & Wolverine Group (ALL messaging confidential)

https://www.facebook.com/groups/415064292839013

Exotic Animals Register (ALL messaging confidential)

https://www.facebook.com/groups/333424654278541

Ufology and Ufologits need to grow up and look at the real world once in a while.

 I think, before I let this blog go, I need to make my position clear on certain points especially since certain Ufologists keep telling outright lies (some of this may be due to mental instability on their part).

I do not believe that an extra terrestrial space craft crashed anywhere in Wales. Samples of material I had turned out to have mundane origins -as I noted in Some Things Strange & Sinister. Margaret Fry was fully aware of my explanation and I have the correspondence to prove this. Cover ups and a "not of this Earth" material claims were all her own and based on anything but fact.

I am an "MI5 stooge"/"Security Service plant". Again, pure fantasy. I hyave never been in any military ser4vice. I never held the rank of Commander in the Royal Navy nor of Captain or Flight Lieutenant in the Royal Air Force and I was certainly not a Captain in the British Army -all to conduct a secret investigation into UFOs.

I have worked with people who have been in the military and other services just a I have worked with biologists, geographers, aeronautical engineers and astronomers. These are or were all private and unofficial.

I do not believe that either the United Kingdom or United States and certainly not Russia or China have ever had a captured/crashed extra terrestrial craft. What branches of intelligence services do and why is beside the matter. 

In my work on relic British wild cats the Royal Air Force were very helpful and communicative.  When it came to the case of the 'ghost lear jet' (Some Things Strange and Sinister) I receive above and beyond the standard response from the Ministry of Defence. 

When it comes to the subjecxt of UFOs all parties have been fairly straight on the matter and it is important to understand to constraints of the various riules and regulations at work. We have seen how a witness to a UFO sighting can have Ufologists barrage them with phone call, turn up on their doorstep or even get the press involved. Statring constantly that the MoD is using "the Official Secrets Act" to hide things is silly. The data protection act is quite binding -I know because I had to work within its constraints. 

Why is everyone surprised that, despite no defence implications, the intelligence services of various countries still maintain an interest and investigation capacity?  Defence and Intelligence agencies are there not to just prepare for any possible conflict to defend their respective countries.  Just because something (in this case not proven to be extra terrestrial) shows no hostility on a Monday does not mean that it will maintain that stance on Wednesday. "Remember Pearl Harbor!" is not just a war time slogan but has far deeper meaning and if you do not know that then study history.

Radar, satellite and many other means are used by the military-intelligence services to keep an eye on things and a snippet of information such as "The Russians are trying to find out what UFOs are" help in assessing things.  A great deal of equipment used is still unknown to the public (who probably do not care) as well as potential enemies.  Why won't anyone tell us what was discussed at defence oversight meetings? You have to be dense not to know the answer to that.

From the very outset of my own work in the 1970s, when everyone was paranoid and discussing how the MoD wanted to get at their reports, I made it very clear in public and elsewhere that what they needed to do was forward copies of reports to the MoD. I once shocked a UFO conference in the 1970 by announcing that "My work may be private but why would the MoD spy on me when all they have to do is ask for any data they were interested in?" What were Ufologists doing with that data other than putting it in newsletters? 

The Defence and Intelligence communities are not youyr enemies. They may use UFOs a a cover for aircraft or drone testing but that is to be expected.

Personally, I am very happy to see official interest in the conbtinued study of UFOs and my guess is that they know about as much as Ufologists -though some technical data/analysis would be beyond civil;ian groups.

There. I never believed that USAF or US Navy interest in UFOs had stopped (it was well known that it had never stopped) and no doubt in 10 years someone will reveal (again) that it is still ongoing.

Ufology and Ufologits need to grow up and look at the real world once in a while.

let them know!

 Before the blog closes....

The print on demand company are rumoured to be thinking of a book price hike as their printer wants more money. This could mean £5-10 ($5-11) on each book. I'm told this should take place in December but does not include The Red Paper.

So if you know someone who wants to get those UFO or mystery books while they are still at a low price -let them know!

Sunday -bye-bye blog

 I did write that November was the crunch point for this blog.  338, 042 views and I've made 1,237 posts and...nothing. Not a jot.

That shows there to be no real interest in the blog or ele there would not be just silence and no forwarding of reports or items.

So, Sunday -bye-bye blog and you'll need to visit the Face Book group or buy the books.

The UFO Factor

Anyone Can Write A Book...But Do Those Books Count?

 In this day and age, so long as you are semi-literate, it is easy enough to write a book. Cut/copy and paste and alter the odd sentence and then throw a few over used images in. 

There is a reason why I, specialising for over 40 years in reports of Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Alien Entity cases no longer buy new books on the subject. They are all the ame and add nothing new new just the ame old "Grey abduction agenda"...or Reptile abduction agenda...or Tall Whites abduction agenda...I lost count with David Jacobs last book -is another race in charge now?

Re-churning the Betty and Barney Hill case or the Kelly-Hopkinsville case or even the Flatwoods incident (which ha been re-written and rebooted so much I hardly recognise it). Two of those cases are from the 1950s and the Hills report is from 1961. Apparently the only report after that was the 1973 Pascagoula event and Travis Walton abduction.

Everything else is ignored because there wa either no big press interest or 'investigators' could not be bothered out of sheer laziness or racism.  Oh, of course, incidents outside of the United States are of no interest.

And so we get stale old report or people adding twists and lie to old cases and even ignoring specific details -important detail.

For me, if I am producing a book then writing is only part of the work. So many names of faceless people in cases and I like to see what these people look like. It shows a human being who underwent an alleged UFO event or was involved in some other report of the strange. I also like to include maps that give readers some idea of the location involved. 

A photograph taken over Alaska purporting to show the city of Bristol (the city I live in) is reported by Forteans and other "knowledgable" persons as having been "lost over 100 years ago".  I search archives and find the source -and the, uh, 'lost photograph.

A drawing of an alleged wild canid given to London Zoological Gardens was 'lost' -I found it and since then it has been used by others without stating who found it.

I have many files and they have copies of pages and images from other 'lost' sources. To me these images or documents are not lost it is just a case that "scribblers" find it easier to churn out the same old stale lines than do any actual research -it is not just in this field of interest either.

Prof. David Bellamy described The Red Paper as "explosive research".

I have a reputation for finding things and that comes from investigation and research. For instance; the Forest of Mouliere.

In Flying Saucer Review vol. 16 no. 4, July/August 1970, is an article titled Eerie Night at the Chateau Des Martins. Written by Jean-Claude Baillon of Cercle d'Information des Phenomenes Insolites (CIESPI) it concerned a night-time incidents that, as far a I am aware, was never adequately concluded (see Mysterious `and Strange Beasts).  Quite by accident Baillon came across a newspaper item on an old legend "The Monster of the Forest of Mouliere". The story is quoted but for me this was a mystery attached to another mystery.

As far as I could find out this FSR article was the only instance of the Mouliere story being printed in English.  I was told that the "legend" was of no interest to UFO groups or others interested in mysteries -it was a local legend.

Well, it interested me. It took a week or so but I managed to get copies of the pages citing this mystery from the actual original source. I even managed to get a map that was useful and even a photograph of La Comtessa Dash taken later in her life.

And all of this then gets tidied up and presented in the book. But even then I still check regularly to see whether anything new can be found but to date -nothing.

The Beast of Faudiere and its exploits were mentioned in a letter in 1800, Tweny years on I still dig around.

And the most important thing is that each of my books is fully referenced so anyone can continue the research if they want to. No quote from this book or that book and no reference to the original source: it is all there.

Foxes and the 2000 Attempted Survey

 

In 2000 I sent out a letter to fox watch groups as well as the various British Naturalist Asociation (BNA) to try to get cooperation on the Fox and Hybrid Study Project.

I followed up with a second letter.

Emails.

With the BNA member groups I got in contact by phone -apparently they did not do that type of field work...in fact, as I noted to the Secretary of the BNA, they were only interested in talking about butterflie and pretty birdies.

On 27th July, 2001 I noted on the folder: "No response from any fox study groups" and that was it.

A pity since I had been getting reports of various foxes, including Acrtic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) from people around the country -I often ended talking on the phone with people about foxes more than 'big cats' on some days!

The following is the initial letter and questionaire I sent out in 2000 and it is not that stressful to complete but I suspect a few of the groups were more social gatherings than anything else.

Would have been nice to see what data we could have come up with.