Death Worms: Fact or Fiction? | Monstrum

Each report has to be treated individually not as part of a clump of reports

 In my It's Been Over Three Years post it appears that I was not clear enough.

I think that the data shows that Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Alien Entity cases are rare. They may total (depending on what your criteria for acceptance are) just a couple of hundred reports and many have not been investigated to any degree.

I use the term Close Encounters of the Third Kind (CE3K) as I believe the plethora of encounter types put forward are confusing things. If you are going to use the 4th, 5th or whichever to indicate a suspected psychological case then just state "CE3K -Psychological". The vast majority of alleged "generational alien abductions" and "Greys" accounts can be dismissed. Hopkins and Jacobs et al just lost the plot and Jacobs in particular has flown into nonsensical fantasy.

Witnesses in UFO landings who saw entities only briefly were put under hypnosis to see "whether anything else happened thatthey had forgotten" and from there we went into the Greys and generational abductions and even pre-birth abductions and past lives abductions. No one within Ufology seriously questioned this. 

In fact the utter ignorance of self claimed "veteran Ufologists" who claim to have been investigating for "thirty plus years" is amazing. Refer to CE3Ks and you hear "Well, people reporting those little critters" and that  followed by "Whatever that's meant to be about" -moronic. You "believe" these are alien (or the current favourite for which there is absolutely no scientific data) or"other dimensional" and "multiversal" -good for sci fi and comic books or movies but really. The point is just what or whom do these "seasoned veterans" actually think are piloting their extra terrestrial craft? 

It is almost as though they get their Ufological training from trash TV documentaries, You Tube and the old Weekly World News.  The very first quesation that they should be asking themselves is; "If these are extra terrestrial craft -what is controlling/piloting them?" That was the very first question I asked as a smooth-faced newbie in 1973. Sadly, all I really got was the George Adamski and other contactee "space brothers" crap and at the time I asked outright why, if these space brothers were here to stop us having a nuclear war and destroying ourselves why the bloody hell were they just whizzing around the planet picking up some of the most ridiculous and crooked people around?

If you see a Boeing 747 or a military jet you KNOW that it is being piloted. That makes logical sense.  So is "lard on the brain" stopping Ufologists realising the same about their claimed "extraterrestrial craft"? Come on. After 30-35 years they sit on their asses reading UFO books and magazines and all the fake documents put out there but skirt past anything looking at CE3K?  

I once watched a You Tube video in which an ex cop turned Ufologist was talking about his crack team of investigators, showing off files and maps and do you know what had occupied their timeas crack MUFON investigators for several months?  A small point of light high in the sky that had moved erratically before vanishing -"only a pinpoint of light but it is  significant".  How?  Do you know how much space junk there is up there and do you realise that not every satellite put into orbit is officially listed so you can check what time it passes overhead?

Jacques Vallee, Ted Phillips and many others have much lauded 'data bases' but when you look atwhat they have gathered and listed as actual factual events but that were known as hoaxes or explained in the 1960s you notice that thpose data bases are pointless. When you see them referring to accounts from newspapers as the source because no one in 30, 40 or 55 years has actually investigated the cases then you realise Ufology has nothing. When you tick off one known hoax from a supposedly "scientific catalogue" it is bad enough but 10? 20? that is just a new form of collecting so that you can brag how many reports you have.

If you look into as many cases as possible and get as much data as you can (which I have since 1974) then you realise that many accounts are newspaper, Ufological or other hoaxes and many are misidentifications -one landed UFO with an occupant carrying outrepairs on it during the False French UFO Wave of 1954 turned out to be a broken down bus -known locally and later picked up on by others but that case is still cited today -inbcluding by Jacques Vallee.

What I meant in that post was this: not "many hundreds" and certainly not "many thousands" of 'credible CE3Ks but maybe 150-200 that need more looking into. Certainly NOT "millions of humans abducted by aliens".

Each report has to be treated individually not as part of a clump of reports.

It's Been over Three Years....

 Apparently, I did not realise this until I checked the date, over three years ago I asked any blog reader (and there are a lot of you) who had read or knew of a report or article about someone who had encountered a UFO and entities as a one off experience to get in touch.

Nothing.

In fact, I know from having spoken to a couple people that when reporting such incidents thaey were told that they were probably lifelong abductees. They pointed out that they were not and that this was a one off incident. They were told again that they WERE lifelong abductees because all ofvtheresaearch pointed to this in "every" such incident even if only a landed UFO and entities seen but no interaction. They were given the option of being put in touch with a "specialist abductees group" or their report could not be looked into.

This is exactly what I predicted would happen well over 20 years ago in articles and posts and later in my books. There are many credible accounts of UFO/entity encounters from 1950 up until the time everyone went "grey abductions" crazy. Look at Euporia, Mississippi in 1973 where racial prejudice reared its ugly head; local investigators chasing up any and every UFO incident but refusing to look at a multi witness incident on a U.S. Highway -because those witnesses were "black" -MUFON still refuses to even consider the case.

Imagine that you genuinely see a strange craft land and entities emerge -there is no interacytion but after a couple of minutes the entities re-enter the object and it leaves. You report it and you are told you were abducted. A dashboard clock may well tell you that you can account for every minute but as David Jacobs stated in his UFO evangelical style -"You saw a UFO and it vanished: YOU WERE ABDUCTED!" no question about it. Are you seriously going to have to go through all the messing around and state you were abducted just to get somone to take yourreport seriously....or do you back away and keep quiet?

What surprised me, because you are never told this but have to dig to find out, is that many percipients or witnesses in these events would never have been known and we would know nothing about the Betty & Barney Hill, the Liberty, Kentucky incident or many others if it had not been for ufologists exposing these people to the press or betraying confidences for their own gain.

Think about that. The Betty and Barney Hill account and all the extra evidence surrounding it -taken  to the grave or a family secret. The 1976  Mona Stafford, Louise Smith and Elaine Thomas abduction event -unknown and taken to the grave (I believe Stafford was still alive as of 2020). Even the Walton case would not be known had it not been for the actions of Ufologists at the time. 

In fact, after writing my last book dealing with the subject, Beyond UFO Contact: Aliens from Mind, Time & Space (2020), I sat down and looked at the reports, both abductions and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, from 1950-1995 and realised that  at a rough count over 50 we would not know about if Ufologists had not broken confidential agreements with those involved. The figure is probably higher and it is a sad fact that many persons reporting such events were never even spoken to by investigators after 30 years  and when some were those self righteous lazy clod-hoppers had the audacity to chastise reporters and newspapers for bad reporting! Absolutely no "If an investigator had gotten his lazy ass out of a chair and bothered we would not have been quoting incorrect facts for over thirty years" oh no. Everyone's fault but their own. So after 40, 50 and 60+ years many of those percipients are no longer with us. We've lost testimony. Eupora would today be classed as a major incident but decades on not one witness (that is still alive) has been spoken to.

Here is another fact worth considering; I know of several incidents where news got out and reached ufologists and the shameful behaviour of those 'truth seekers' made the witnesses withdraw and we lost testimony -one 'investigator' told me that the witness to a landing was obviously a "UFOnut" because he claimed "something" left the landed objkect. In another series ofg events at a quarry in the UK ufologists let the localpress and media know what was going on -this led to witnesses seeing chuckling TV presenters and reporters recounting their "tales". One witness to a landing refused outright to speak and workers at the quarry had told the BBC that if their mocking reporter returned he would be sent for a flight over the edge ofthe quarry.

There are cases in which someone hides, observes a landing and an entity gets out and after a minute or so re-enters the object which takes off but they are no longer in hiding but standing out in the open and a brief encounter was obviously far more involved and years later this was indicated, however, the secret went with them to the grave. M. Mass at Valensole, France was a similar case. When you realise that a straight forward narrative that should go from A to E does so but misses out B, C and D, you can ask why but the person involved will either say they were 'mistaken' or "No. I am never going to say what else happened". 

How many witnesses/percipients have encountered something but seeing all the TV and You Tube trash decided that they are "not getting involved in that crap!" or just accepted it as Bob Taylor did after his encounter at Livingstone as "It happened. You get on with your life"?  This is a line repeated by a number of percipients whose lives were shattered by an encounter but afterwards (in some cases suffering physical and mental trauma) decide that it happened and they have to get on with their lives.  How many have decided this that we do not know about because fiction has taken over from fact or because they do not want to be known as "another one of those crazy UFO abductees" (even if they aren't?

Hopkins and Jacobs along with others has made it almost impossible for someone to report a brief encounter and with MUFON there is the fear that personal details (supposedly confidential) might be sold on?

I am not a debunker and never have been. I am a sceptic and I look at the evidence and assess cases by evidence or by making a decision as to how credible someone is. That should be clear from my books.  Until I actually encounter an alien spacecraft I cannot state that aliens are landing on Earth. Even going by what percipients state I cannot say that but if everything points to them not lying and there is back-up evidence such as unconnected observers, etc all I can state is that they seem genuine so it is then up to readers to decide extraterrestrial or not. 

But we need the testimony because it cannot all be dismissed by genuine debunkers who insist every single observer is "mistaken" or "suffering an altered state" (which they clearly do not understand) and if the accounts are genuine....

The Story Behind The McPherson Tape

Still almost hard to believe that people -including some Ufologists- still cite this as being a genuine lost tape.

Publishing and if you have been considering buying one of my books...act fast!

 In case you are wondering (I know you are not but I am trying to be polite) what happened to the book price rises here is the story.

I am disputing my right to withdraw my books from sale in the United States because I get hit hard by U.S. taxes on sales which means I make back around $1 on a book sold. Add the fluctuating exchange rate (and my print on demand firms goes for the time advantageous for them to pay me) and books of 300+ pages, fully illustrated and which took me years to write are going for free. The books were supposedly my "living" and I am not making any "living" at the moment.

At £20 a book that was cheap so if I am unable to block the U. S. as a market (not something I would normally do) the prices have to increase. I have no choice because I am just giving everything away and no publisher is willing to take on books of this type in the UK because they do not understand them. Seriously.

The above was from August and a lot has been going on since. Apparently, as the author and publisher and owner of all rights to my books I cannot remove them from sale in the United States. THAT is not what the PODpromised with "publishing freedom". For the sale of £80 worth of books I 'earned' £18.00 )just translate that as $). 

The POD also hit publishers with new increased printing prices which they say will not affect current books but they will not explain HOW they are going to get the extra money they want and despite asking there is no answer -the likelihood is that it will come from my sales money.

Oh, then they decided that from early October there will be a "handling charge" but have flatly refused to say how much and who is going to pay this charge -again it is suspected that this will come from MY sales which means two things...

1.  Withdraw the books

2. Increase the prices to cover both new and as yet unknown charges.

So, until the new details are given in October the books stay at the current prices but after that....

Military insiders reveal their classified UFO encounters | FULL EPISODE ...

Skinny Bob The Truth Revealed - Paranormal (un)Explained #28